Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
God, Slashdot has gone to shit. Yesterday 2 trolls modding themselves up to +5, now people with no substantiated facts being modded up simply because they imply the United States is somehow evil. I think it is time to leave this place to burn itself down.
Further, please read a post before you reply to it. "Having your property associated with a crime does not prove criminal activity itself. It at best proves you were an accessory." Nothing you said in any way relates to what I said.
Except not. Having your property associated with a crime does not prove criminal activity itself. It at best proves you were an accessory.
Your post is just scare tactics regurgitated from ISP PR departments, to sell more connections by scaring people into closing their public nodes.
You link an image from Facebook, such as a "like" button. Every time someone views your page, that button is accessed, and your domain is the referrer. Facebook then sees the IP of the person viewing that image, and that referrer, and can potentially correlate that easily with the known IPs of Facebook users. Volla, Facebook knows every site you have been to.
This is not some kind of mythical concept. This was actually used to cause a brief hack scare on a site I used to administer.
That is not even getting into CSS hacks, which are still, effectively, open, and allow any site to access your browser history.
It's also pretty classic you're accusing me of being a tinfoil hat, considering you spent several hours going on about the evils of cookies and how this law is needed to protect your privacy, but that's ok, it's obvious you're a troll. I post this for the benefit of others, as I realize my original post was not totally clear.
Well, I can see the supporters of this measure are as mature as they come.
It will break it as it stands. That qualifies as "breaking" it in my book. The fact it can be fixed is irrelevant to the act of breaking it.
Also, broken window fallacy. Creating jobs is not an excuse to break things that work fine now.
"you're not too bright are ya... there are also laws that prohibit murder, but it doesn't prevent people from being murdered... maybe such pointless laws should be dropped too?"
If there was a law that stated you could not kill someone with a bladed weapon, and no law saying you could bludgeon them to death, then yes. It is stupid and ineffectual to have one but not the other, ESPECIALLY if part of the law calls for outlawing cooking knives.
"the law is about establishing a level of risk in doing what is against the law, so that if you engage in breaking the law there is a risk that you'll be caught and punished."
Or... people can simply do the same nasty things via still legal and not much more complicated means, effectively only harming the legitimate applications of the effectively banned technology.
"introducing a law that prohibits using such cookies without user consent means that there is now risk in engaging in some (not all) online privacy invasion "
1. Real privacy threats are outside EU jurisdiction, and will continue on their merry way.
2. It is trivial to shift tracking to other means.
3. It is NOT so trivial to shift legitimate uses, many of which lack good alternatives, as I and others have explained.
Benefits: near nil.
This isn't a well-reasoned policy. That leads me to think it is a feel-good policy.
Europeans especially seem to be unusually prone to this. At least us Americans tend to bitch about everything before, during, and after; that's arguably why we're still freer in a lot of important ways, despite having a much larger number of right-wing loons. It's also why nothing passes on a federal level other than "we dislike Hitler" bills. I'd still rather that than the alternative, though.
Or, you could, you know, block their cookies. Or disable cookies entirely. Or get the fuck off the internet if you are THAT worried about privacy, because, let me tell you, cookies are the absolute least of most people's privacy woes here.
Check the link in my signature. It's relevant.