Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?
Slashdot Deals: Prep for the CompTIA A+ certification exam. Save 95% on the CompTIA IT Certification Bundle ×

Comment Re:F that (Score 1) 806

Other points have been discussed replies from others, I just want to chime in about "big" dogs. Most small dog species are mentally retarded - so if you're getting a dog for intelligent company, you don't get much choice than big dogs.

Some big dogs can be dumb, and some small dogs can be smart but big ones on an average are smarter by some margin.

Comment Re:you're both right (Score 1) 806

Dogma, most often repeated to dazzle small fish into thinking the stock market is a place where money is generated, instead of stolen

No one said that. And "Small fish" might also think that a vegetable market is a place where vegetables are grown. They would be as wrong as "small fish" who think that "stock market is a place where money is generated".

The company backing the stock is what might generate the money - stock is just a part representation of it. In the process of conversion/division of companies into stocks, and the sale/exchange process of course has some stealing as well as inefficiencies.

Comment Re:BSD is looking better all the time (Score 1) 742

it is the Unix way that is preventing it from going further

So you are saying any violation of the Unix philosophy will make it "go further"? Probably not, but if yes, I give up on you.

If no, are you saying linux kernel, or other "good" non-systemd things never violate the unix philosophy? If so, you are wrong. ZFS, and Btrfs violate the Unix philosophy quite spectacularly by merging filesystem, LVM, checksum etc. into one monolithic piece. Linus himself was against this initially (especially in the context of encryption), but he has come to terms with reality. Looked at very narrowly, emacs is a violation of the Unix philosophy because of being large, complex and multi-functional. But there are good reasons for those violations.

So smart violation of Unix philosophy is already underway. The remaining argument is about whether systemd stuff is violating Unix philosophy in a smart or a dumb way. Let us define smart to be something that improves the software rather than increase profits of a company while making lives of users/customers/administrators miserable.

I don't see an argument from you about how systemd kind of violation of Unix philosophy is a smart. If not, systemd's existence itself could be the "crime" here.

Comment Re:Bullshit (Score 1) 742

He had a mouthful to say to Poettering and rest of the systemd committers when they contributed code to the kernel. They were even banned from contributing to kernel, if I remember correctly.

Linus doesn't and shouldn't interfere with things out of his scope - systemd is emphatically outside of his scope. Kernel and git are definitely within his scope and he hasn't minced words to defend them.

Comment Re:Are you trying to imply that systemd is faster? (Score 1) 742

Flinging poo at systemd is like yelling "get a horse!" when seeing a car, back in the 1900s. True at the moment, but in time proven to be shortsighted.

Do you have credible proof that it will be proven to be shortsighted? If not, you might want to say the following, much less exciting statement:

"Flinging poo at systemd might be like yelling "get a horse!" when seeing a car"

Or do you believe in proof by analogy? By this proof methodology, you could have proven in 1944 that there won't be any nuclear bomb explosion next year, because a nuclear bomb is like the proof of Fermat's last theorem - it hasn't been built yet and won't be by next year.

Comment Re:As much as possible (Score 1) 350

Like-for-like, a comparable Dell comes in at around 60-80% of a new MBP

That is if you start with an MBP. If you start with Dell - cheapest 16 GB business Dell Laptop (i5558-8574SLV) sells for $859 on Newegg. NOW try to get MBP that matches it - cheapest MBP with 16 GB RAM is $1799 on Apple's website ($1889 on Newegg so ignoring that).

Dell ends up costing 47% of MBP, in other words, less than half.

Chose memory for two reasons -
1. /. story is about memory.
2. Increasing tendency of Apple to solder memory.

Comment Re:Why not start now..and take if further? (Score 1) 373

For example, do you include clothing weight? If so, expect passengers to start stripping when they are on the borderline of a cheaper weight bracket. Like boxers do.

If they intend to carry along the stripped clothes, it counts as luggage and the charge should be almost[1] the same as if it were on their bodies.

If they don't intend to carry along the clothes, airport might charge them for waste disposal if it is a huge tonnage of clothing but otherwise not a problem.

As far as naked people making others uncomfortable, this problem pops up even without charging people for weight, so neither surprising nor insoluble nor unheard of in the service industries.

[1] Luggage can be slightly cheaper than live human bodies because it is easier to tie down and distribute. Luggage also doesn't shout when it is separated from its "friends and family" to adjust center of mass of the aircraft.

Comment Re:Why not start now..and take if further? (Score 1) 373

Charging for weight may not be discrimination. Most restaurants already charge extra for people who eat more. The others, the all-you-can-eat buffets, "discriminate" against anorexics by charging same for any amount of food eaten. Hell, hospitals charge ONLY the people who get sick - no hospital ever charged me for being healthy, but many of them charged me for being unhealthy.

It is even less likely to be considered discrimination if the price is fixed price + (weight in pounds)*(few cents).

Currently airlines are afraid to charge for weight because then wider people will start demanding their full quota of space. Charge for weight would justify their girth, at least in their own opinions. Separate charge for width is complicated to explain to users, and aircraft seating configuration is not easy to change for a single flight.

Many people are unenthusiastic about their work.