Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Note: You can take 10% off all Slashdot Deals with coupon code "slashdot10off." ×

Comment Re:A HUD is usefull... (Score 1) 410

I also can't see why I'd want a built-in satnav, though I wouldn't mind having a cradle that connected my phone to a larger display. The one advantage to builtin satnav is that the display can be clearer and more informative.

I own an add-on Garmin, and while I like it, I use my phone far more often. Among other things, it has a much better understanding of traffic and how to route around it. (My particular Garmin model does get traffic information over the air, but that information is much less precise and useful than the Internet can give it.) I keep it around for those days when I'm out of coverage, and a few other circumstances, but it's mostly relegated to taking up space and getting out of date. (It also has map updates, but they don't happen automatically. And a major new interchange near my house took a very long time to appear. I didn't need it, but people coming to my place sometimes got confused.)

So I can see why a car my want I/O features, but the smarts might as well be relegated to the device I'm already carrying with me. It would be nice to have better audio controls than fiddling with the phone itself, for example.

Comment Re:Teachers (Score 1) 240

Different AC here. ... P.P.S.: Fuck the last 5 years of UX "professionals" who think ... menu options should change depending on which options the software decides are more frequently used. Neither group knows anything of muscle memory because neither group has been in the industry long enough for it to matter.

Although, to be fair to UX "professionals" there is no muscle memory so powerful that it cannot be compromised with sufficient alcohol. Still getting 80wpm tonight. But somehow missed the post-anon button. Sometimes the UX "professional" doesn't have to move the clickbox. It's moving on my system, though!

Comment Re:Teachers (Score 1) 240

My touch typist teacher said RIGHT. Never considered the left.

Different AC here. Basic non-ergo Keytronic layout. I use left hand, not right hand, and I was taught touch typing (and can still do 100wpm) by a teacher who taught by the book that says "right-handed."

Even though the "6" is, properly speaking, in the "6/y/h/n" vertical row that "belongs" to the right hand, I just looked closely at my fingers on the actual physical keyboard on which I've typed for 10+ years, and its clones on which I've typed for at least 20+, it's because the "6" is closer to the left index finger than the right index finger. The pad of my hand (not the wrist, about halfway up the pad beneath my pinky finger) rests on the lower edge of my keyboard, and my thumbs rest so comfortably on the spacebar that the spacebar has a little worn spot on it.

Home exercise: Place fingers on home row. Touch right and left index fingers to "T", "Y", and "R". For my fingers and keyboard, "Y" is the most comfortable, almost dead-center. Repeat experiment with "5/6/7". For my fingers/keyboard, I can't reach "5" with right. I can't reach "7" with left, and "6" is reachable with either, but more easily reached with left finger. with left on "T" and right on "y" almost centered beneath "6", left is visually confirmed closer to "6."

(Side note: Both by size of wear spot and by observation while typing this post, I almost exclusively press the space bar with my *right* thumb. Maybe that contributes to using my left idex to hit th 6 key -- my left thumb is basically unused. I just typed this entire sentence with my left thumb crammed under the keyboard and it felt comfortable. Undoable with right thumb in equivalent positon.)

P.S; Our touch-typing teachers taught us the same way, but for me and my keyboard, we cheat on the "6". I've forgotten whether it's supposed to matter which thumb you use on the space bar, although I imagine I could have squeezed out a couple of extra wpm if I'd used both thumbs in high school.

P.P.S.: Fuck the last 5 years of UX "professionals" who think everything has to change every six months for the hell of it, or the last 15 years who think that menu options should change depending on which options the software decides are more frequently used. Neither group knows anything of muscle memory because neither group has been in the industry long enough for it to matter.

Comment "Moral damages"? (Score 2) 49

TFS doesn't say exactly what she was suing over. TFA says she "sued the secretive company for alleged moral damages, non-payment of wages and for failing to give workers proper contracts".

So, I'm puzzled. If she was due wages, she should have gotten more than one rouble. I'm not sure of the compensation for failing to give proper contracts; it sounds like it's something akin to violating an oral contract.

What are moral damages? A quick Google doesn't turn up much; it sounds like a legal concept not used in the US. Can anybody enlighten me?

Submission + - Malvertising ads infest websites with 100++ million visitors->

An anonymous reader writes: Angler exploit's SSL malvertising campaign source and details from MalwareBytes https://blog.malwarebytes.org/... infesting sites like:

weather.com 121M visits per month
drudgereport.com 61.8M visits per month
wunderground.com 49.9M visits per month
findagrave.com 6M visits per month
webmaila.juno.com 3.6M visits per month
my.netzero.net 3.2M visits per month
sltrib.com 1.8M visits per month

Link to Original Source

Comment Re: What does that mean? (Score 1) 111

Well, "with bated breath" means that. "Bated" means "held" or "restrained", though it's practically never used any more except in that expression. It's cognate to "abate".

Optional pedantry: Shakespeare used "bate" in the "restrained" sense, including this from Much Ado: "she will die, if he woo her, rather than she will bate one breath of her accustomed crossness" (Meaning: If he makes a pass at her, she would rather die than cut back even a little bit on her usual insults.)

Comment Re:Profits. (Score 1) 179

Also... don't most health care providers buy their own stethoscopes? I got the impression that they're rather personal choices, and since they go in your ears, it's not like you'd want to check one out of the equipment supply. You buy it, and it's yours.

It might well improve the lives of the lowest paid health care providers, but I don't think they're a major cost driver for first-world companies.

Comment Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid (Score 1) 254

It sure doesn't help that floating figures and captions are handled variably even within a single editing session of MS Word. It's no surprise to me that LibreOffice screws it up. After all these years of work Office still doesn't seem to grasp the fundamental notions of what a document is and how it works. They seem to view formatting as a kind of paste-up thing, rather than giving users a set of conventions.

Comment Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid (Score 1) 254

I think users really like to have the formats applied first, since a second formatting pass feels tedious.

I believe it wouldn't be unreasonable to provide a template and then lock off all other formatting tools from users at edit-time. Here are all the paragraph styles you get; here are the headers and footers. You can make tables, but all you get to define are rows and columns and maybe headers.

That wouldn't fix everything, but at the very least discouraging users from fiddling with the format instead of working would make for more attractive documents that would, coincidentally, be easier to transfer to other editors.

Comment Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid (Score 3, Insightful) 254

Most of the people I encounter can barely use the basic functionality of Microsoft Office, which is something that LibreOffice has covered.

There is one crucial feature that isn't covered perfectly: absolute compatibility with MS Office. For a large number of office workers, Office is a collaboration tool. A document saved by one user and emailed to another, then edited and returned, needs to be able to preserve all of the formatting. Users care a *lot* about formatting, and if it gets messed up, they lose confidence in the software.

Office's formatting algorithms are abominable, and it's no surprise that LibreOffice can't mimic them perfectly. And users really, really need to apply a lot less formatting and focus instead on content.

Still... for a lot of offices, that's going to be the one unbreakable rule. MS Office is the de facto standard, and anything else needs to comply with that, even if the standard is for something user's shouldn't really want and which is poorly implemented (perhaps specifically to make it impossible to switch).

I'd love to see more offices switch to something like Google Docs or other systems with minimal formatting, so that they can stop tinkering with fonts and actually focus on the words. Sadly, users do love it.

Comment Re:Professor? (Score 1) 458

The actual laws get written in committees a bit bigger than that, around one to two dozen. Actually, the original text is generally written by 2 or 3 people (and their aides, another 4-8 people), and then tinkered with by the group as a whole.

The laws then get amended by the full group, 100 or 435 people, but that doesn't generally change the fundamental structure of the bill.

The process does kinda sorta work. Or at least, it used to, a couple of decades ago. These days, there's usually enough incentive for one party or the other to make sure it doesn't happen, that nothing does. But at least in theory, it's a decent enough structure for a republic, as long as the public doesn't actively hate each other.

Comment Re:Professor? (Score 1) 458

The power of the oligarchs is easy to restrict. The government has a fair bit of power to constrain them, if the Congress authorizes them to. The problem is that the Congress is deeply divided between two nearly equal parties, and we've designed the rules so that it takes overwhelming support (the House plus the Senate plus the President plus the Supreme Court) to do anything.

The Congress is divided because the people are divided. You can complain about the oligarchs, but your real problem is with the 150 million or so voters who disagree bitterly with your solutions. You can try to appeal to some of the 150 million or so who didn't vote at all. (And that's for a high-turnout year. The numbers are worse in the off years.) The voters *do* have the power. They just have to be unified, or rather, a lot more unified than they are.

I disapprove deeply of those voters who support the "oligarchs". I think they're stupid for buying into the line of BS that the "oligarchs" spew through their media channels. And so I blame them more than the oligarchs themselves. But the worst part is, they blame me just as much, and it doesn't do any good to just rail against either the oligarchs or their stupid voters. You change their minds, not mine, if you want something.

Adding manpower to a late software project makes it later. -- F. Brooks, "The Mythical Man-Month"