writes: The "Android One" initiative in India was launched with one purpose — to deliver the latest version of Android quickly to budget smartphones. However, with Lollipop being released way back in June 2014, Android One users still haven't gotten the latest update, whereas other manufacturers like Motorola, Xoom etc have managed to roll it out to their phones. So much for "approved hardware". A couple of days ago, Caesar Sengupta VP product management announced on Google+ that Lollipop would finally be coming to Android One devices. Far from placating the crowd, this announcement seems to have seriously pissed them off. Hell hath no fury like a customer scorned!
But this begs the question — what's the point of Google "approving" certain devices if it takes so long to bring out updates to them? Why are other manufacturers able to beat them to it? And most importantly, why promise fast updates when you're not going to be able to keep that promise?Link to Original Source
writes: Brazil's IGB Electronica filed for the "iPhone" trademark way back in 2000 and it wanted to retain exclusive rights to the name. Apple didn't like this and filed a lawsuit. The Brazil's Institute of Industry Property (INPI) sided with IGB saying that Apple had no right to use the name "iPhone" since it was already taken. Apple appealed that. In a bizarre ruling today, the appeals court overturned the lower court's ruling saying "all the (Apple) product's renown and client following have been built on its performance and excellence as a product." So that's ok then. No exclusive trademark rights for someone who filed for it eight years before the iPhone was even a product. This begs the question though...why did Apple even take this to court? Shouldn't it just accept that someone else trademarked the name and move on?Link to Original Source