Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Note: You can take 10% off all Slashdot Deals with coupon code "slashdot10off." ×

Comment Re:Why IPv6 is broken (Score 1) 595

IPv6 is broken because it is incompatible.

To illustrate, let's look at phone numbers.

Imagine a phone company with 6 digit numbers which wants to give users world-accessible phone-numbers. What did the phone companies do? Easy: Just add prefixes to the numbers and everybody is happy. The old numbers stay valid, you can still connect within the old network(s), nobody has to remember new numbers.

But what if phone-numbers would have been expanded the "IPv6-way"?

Then you would have your old number and would receive a completely different new number, which would also be in an incompatible format (maybe letters instead of digits). Then you would have to update all your phone numbers everywhere, to "switch over".
of course such a scheme would fail instantly and that's why IPv6 continues to fail.

The IPv6 adherents just don't get it. If the IPv6-designers were smart enough to just extend the IPv4-address space we would all be running IPv6 already, because it would require no reconfiguration of routers, no reconfiguration of DNS names, no reconfiguration of anything.

But these morons thought that a billion people will just change all their addresses just because they tell them. Well, it doesn't work that way.

I'm really surprised a person who's been around as long as you have holds to this view.

IP6 was in many ways designed to solve problems in IP4- not just address space issues. Thus a break. Because you had to break IP4 to fix it. At this point IP4 is a patched frankenstein protocol with lots of holes, bad implementations, and quasi adherence to RFCs.

Extending IP4 address space would not solve the problems. A new model is needed.

Comment Re:so many problems with this idea (Score 3, Informative) 80

not least of which, allowing an organisation that is answerable to none but the United States Supreme Court to regulate a virtual currency that is in direct competition with its own pet, the Almighty Dollar.

Right... because allowing a random guy in Asia to regulate the exchange worked out great?

Comment This has been know for a while... (Score 5, Funny) 121

This is obviously an advanced data stream which we are intercepting. Civilizations who do not have control over quantum entanglement, Use compressed radio bursts at unbelievable magnitude to transfer massive amounts of information across multiple civilizations simultaneously.

This has been known for about 10 years. But suppressed due to it;s sensitive nature.

Attempts to decode the messages have only been marginally successful. The one small decoded message translated into English is roughly: "Never going to give..."

The rest of the message can only be guessed at.

Real Programs don't use shared text. Otherwise, how can they use functions for scratch space after they are finished calling them?