Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Slashdot Deals: Deal of the Day - 6 month subscription of Pandora One at 46% off. ×

Comment The IRS keeps its hooks in US citizens who leave. (Score 2) 352

I'd also move my operation to Ireland if I could.

What's stopping you?

The US tax code. The US keeps its hooks in its citizens and companies, for decades, if they try to leave, even if they move out and renounce their citizenship.

The US does this to a far greater extent than other countries who generally don't tax their citizens if they're out of the country for more than half a year. (This is where "The Jet Set" came from: Citizens of various non-US countries who had found a way to earn a living that let them split their time among three or more countries every year and avoid enough income tax to live high-on-the-hog, even on an income that otherwise might be middle-class.)

Only really big companies, with armies of lawyers, can find loopholes that let them effectively move out of the US to a lower-taxing alternative. You'll note that TFA is a lament about how one managed to escape, and how the US might "close THIS loophole" to prevent others from using it.

Comment Re:Simple Fix for H1B Visa Problem (Score 1) 55

Simply require that H-1B visa holders must be paid at least the 90th percentile (or 95th if you like) wage for their field.

Plus any amount that the employer would have to pay into a government entitlement program for a US employee that he doesn't need to pay into said program for a foreigner on H1B (or other work visa systems).

It's even fair. If the program is, say, a retirement program that the visiting worker can't benefit from, shouldn't he have the money to buy a replacement for it elsewhere?

Comment Dow makes LOTS of stuff. (Score 1) 487

... by everyone's favorite munitions manufacturer: Dow Chemical.

Dow makes a LOT of chemical stuff. Some of it's useful to the military.

If their Dow Corning partnership-subsidiary hadn't been hammered into bankruptct by a bunch of (later shown to be bogus) suits claiming medial harm from their silicon breast implants, we might have had hybrid cars a couple decades earlier, out of Detroit rather than Japan, using lenticular, glass fiber, super flywheels, rather than batteries, for energy storage.

Comment Yeah, you'd think that ... (Score 1) 108

It's my understanding that when you're committing a crime, the last thing you want to do is break even worse laws that will get you a worse sentence if caught.

Yeah, you'd think that. And some of them actually do think of that.

But many criminals don't think very well, or very far ahead. Not thinking about being caught is common. Not expecting to be seriously inconvenienced if they ARE caught is common also.

Think about it: How is "Send me a bitcoin or your insulin pump will deliver a fatal dose!" different from armed robbery for a fat wallet? "Give me a bunch of money or I shoot you!" And a bunch of them DO shoot - (VERY) often even if they GOT the money.

The threat of law-enforcement escalation for murder doesn't seem to have stopped up-front-and-personal armed robbery. Why should it stop distant-and-anonymous ransomware?

Comment Trying to stop it also has bad history. (Score 1) 572

The problem is that the whole thing lends itself to "wackadoodles". You have an entire system of belief based on nothing but hearsay ... Then people believe this stuff with no evidence for it ... take some part of that "literal truth" and decide that it really means you need to go murder some people.

Unfortunately, trying to stop it also has bad history. Meme-infected people tend to remain meme-infected until death when opposed (because opposition tends to reenforce such memes), and forcible brain-washing normally doesn't work (though it may get them to pretend to have changed their beliefs, in order to make the pain stop or avoid death or mutilation). Meanwhile there's a long history of people infected with OTHER religious memes using governmental power to wipe out the believers in competing religions.

The history of Europe, in the centuries before the framing of the US' Constitution, was full of disastrous religious wars, and many of the religious groups in the Americas were here to escape this. One of the groups was "The Separatists", the (colorfully dressed "Pilgrims" of the Plymouth colony, often conflated with the "Puritans" who settled a bit farther north) who held, as a core belief,the separation of the church and the state (because each would corrupt the other).

This ideal was built into the first Amendment of the Bill of Rights, pushed by many leaders of small religions (who knew that, if the government picked and promoted a church, it was unlikely to be theirs, and the religious wars would start over here). The US federal government (and, though "incorporation", the states and their subdivisions) is prohibited from doing anything, for or against, any specific religion (including dogmatic non-religion).

And Islam was known to the framers. It shows up in their debates, where it is held up as an example of a non-Christian religion for which the same arguments can be made, for and against, as are made with respect to Christian sects.

So tracking people by religion, as religion, is right out, and any such plan would almost certainly be gutted the first time it hits the courts.

If the government wants to go after the I.S. brigands, it needs to frame the laws and activities in terms of their civil actions, without respect to any religious motivations or professed religious claims.

Comment What happens if you EAT this salad? (Score 1) 39

Does it get broken down into something harmless in the stomach? Or do YOU get conductive lines along YOUR plumbing?

It's not a minor thing: For starters the heartbeat propagation is partly electrical. Better-than-blood-plasma conductors laid out along the plumbing of the heart might affect the heartbeat in a dangerous manner.

Comment Conspiracy theories and the "Second Cover" (Score 1) 42

... there's always room for a conspiracy theory like the NWO controlling both the US and German governments and then some to suppress the truth.

The problem is that people do tend to work together to advance their own interests, and do so in secret to reduce opposition from others. That is the definition of conspiracy. Such activity is not purely mythical or rare - it's pervasive, inherent to the human condition.

Governments, and groups within and/or associated with them, have a long track record of doing such things, getting away with them for years, and having (some of) them come to light decades later. It's always the same story: "Oh, yes, back in the bad old days there were such things going on. But that stuff isn't done any more. (And anybody who claims such stuff is happening now is a nutcase, so pay no attention to him.)"

Then, maybe 30 or 40 years later what was going on THIS time comes to light, and the story repeats. Or somebody blows the whistle while it's still going on and presents evidence (often at great cost to himself), and then it's "That's just a rogue person/agency/group. We're bringing them to heel." or "It's a corrupt administration. Replace the head of state with a different one (maybe from the other major party but keep the same two parties in power) and it's all taken care of." Yeah, right.

Snowden revelations, ECHELON, Watergate, COINTELPRO, Pentagon Papers, Hanford Experiment, Tuskegee Experiment, Factor 8, Abscam, Ng Lap Seng, Iran-Contra, MK-Ultra, Operations MOCKINGBIRD, PHOENIX, and CHAOS, ... I could go on for pages, and that's just big, US (sometimes with allies), stuff that came to light in MY lifetime.

The government has whole agencies tasked with conspiring in secret to collect information and/or intervene to interfere with any opposition to its interests. The US has "Black Budgets" to unauditably fund such activity, and the Department of Defense, alone, spends an estimated $50 BILLION a year on its portion of this (as of 2009).

With their activities occurring in secret, there is much temptation to, and limited checks on, also targeting the biggest risk to the people currently in power in any government: The citizens of the country.

"Spook" agencies have a number of techniques to keep these conspiracies hidden, and one that has come to light (and is appropos) is the "Second Cover". This consists of spreading TWO cover stories: The first is plausible. The second is tinfoil-hat fruitcake material, lightly hidden. Anybody who figures out the first cover IS a cover and starts digging finds the second cover. Then they usually either give up (rather than dig for a third level) or you get new material for the tabloids, and another boost for the "conspiracy theories are ALL crazy talk" meme. (And it also helps that occasionally they DO try out the odd piece of mystic bulls**t, just to see if any of it, like some herbal medicine, DOES work.)

I generally assume (as did The Framers) that this sort of creeping (or galloping) encroachment is inherent in governments, is going on (and having new project starts) all the time, we usually can't tell, through the fog of misdirection, what's going on NOW, and the job of the people, like a farmer clearing weeds and trimming orchard trees, is to continually cut it back to levels that don't ruin our own lives and livelihoods.

Comment I wish they'd ditch daylight savings time. (Score 2) 143

Do you have any IDEA what a mess Daylight Savings Time makes of things like programs for process control and scheduling - and has at least since I did software for it back in the late '70s

Heck: For far longer than that. I hear the railroads handle it like this:
  - In the spring, suddenly all the trains are an hour late. They work their way back to being on-time as they normally would - by running as fast as is practical.
  - In the fall they STOP FOR AN HOUR. They just sit there with their engines running...
It's just easier than trying to figure out something "better" to do about it.

The claims that it saves energy are currently backward and getting more so. They may always have been, or it may be because lighting is more efficient (so the savings is small) while air conditioners are far more prevalent (and run more if people get home earlier).

Meanwhile it increases death rates: From DST-lagged drivers just after a change, from kids getting hit going to school in the dark on more days, from stress-related diseases exacerbated by the stress of the time change.

It also was a big factor in killing drive-in theatres.

If the government MUST twiddle with the clocks seasonally they should set them the OTHER WAY, creating Night Life Savings Time. We ALREADY have a shortage of dark time for evening recreation in the summer. Why take another hour away by shifting the clocks? Add one instead.

Comment Actually, it's because corrupt government is worse (Score 1) 108

Thus we also get ethical arguments that it is better to let 10 guilty men go free than to convict 1 innocent man and so on.

That's not what the ethical issue is about. The issue is "Who Watches The Watchmen?" This issue has been an identified at least since the Roman Empire.

The problem of how to effectively enforce the law on the enforcers of the law is a very difficult one. Militaries and police forces are made up of humans, with human failings. On one hand, they may break the law when convenient. On the other they tend to identify as "us" - the enforcers - vs. "them" - the citizens. One of their number who tries to bring another in for lawbreaking becomes ostracised, as every other rank-and-file officer worries that he's next. Setting up separate departments to police the police just moves the problem one step back.

The solution found by the US courts is the doctrine of the "fruit of the poisoned tree": If the police, prosecutor, etc. break the law in their efforts to apprehend, search for evidence, and/or prosecute their case, everything resulting from that lawbreaking is thrown out. That usually breaks the case beyond redemption and the accused goes free. So lawbreaking by cops and prosecutors is deterred - not by punshment, but by it being counter-productive.

Yes, that means, when the police and/or prosecutors start breaking the law, lots of really bad guys go free (along with any falsely-accused good guys who were illegally processed). But a corrupt criminal justice system is SO MUCH WORSE than ANY number of other sorts of bad guys that it's a good trade.

Comment Not to mention it's the same bunch of "rednecks" (Score 1) 387

Indeed, NASA has suggested that the exploration of space is like NASCAR only with rocket ships instead of souped up, high powered cars.

No to mention that many of the rocket scientists and/or astronauts/test pilots are the same sort of - occasionally even the same instances of - "rednecks" that build and/or drive the cars.

Sure there were also transplanted German rocket scientists. But the Otto Cycle - the four-stroke cycle of the gasoline engine - was originated (with "coal gas" for the fuel) by a German scientist / engineer, too: Nikolaus August Otto.

Comment How to tell if your chickens have your credit card (Score 1) 381

You get a delivery of half a dozen of these - along with a 55-galon drum of freeze-dried mealworms to tide them over until the "livestock" are producing.

Seriously: Mealworms are something like 50% protein. Chickens LOVE them. Mealworms and yoghurt are the chicken version of sweet-and-sour shrimp. The main problem with using them for chicken treats is that the chickens will eat enough to overdose on protein and destroy their kidneys.

We have a show hen that the breeder had to stop showing: The breeder had tried to train her, using a reward of mealworms, to assume an erect posture to impress the judges. The hen decided that if standing up straight was good for getting a mealworm, going farther would get her more. So she started doing backflips - which mostly impressed the judges as weird (and possibly a sign of impaired balance) rather than just enthusiasm.

Commercial mealworms are pricey and flour is cheap. We've considered growing our own mealworms for "the girls", but that's a bit more labor-intensive than we're into. If this gadget is cheap enough an automatic enough (and non-stinky enough) they've got a sale - and probably a lot of them once the chicken fanciers find out about it.

Comment Re:Patent protected (Score 1) 101

At $100/gram.

And hit the "terms" tab. Excerpt:

* "Researcher" acknowledges that all materials are supplied strictly for non-human research purposes only, except for those instances in which such is clearly and explicitly otherwise specified. ...

Products protected by valid patents are not offered for sale in countries where the sale of such products constitutes a patent infringement. Buyers shall verify the patent status for their respective country.

Products currently covered by valid Patents are offered for R&D use in accordance with 35 USC 271(e)+A13(1) in the US, EC Directive 2001/82/EC, 2001/83/EC, and their amendments in EU. Similar laws and rules may apply in other countries.

So it's not offered for sale in the US, due to the patent, except possibly for R&D use under that US code section. (No time to look it up right now.)

As I recall US law, drugs not approved are currently prohibited, under decades-old "designer drug" legislation which was passed to halt sales of an apparently unending series of minor molecular tweaks on recreational drugs (often with horrible side-effects).

2 pints = 1 Cavort