Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:I guess the FDA hates birds (Score 1) 265

There was a RadioLab podcast on this very subject about ten months ago:

The prevailing wisdom seems to be that the ecosystem will not take a huge hit. I believe the quote was something like, "It will just be like Los Angeles is all the time". The best they could come up with was that it could allow some better predators to thrive, but they seemed pretty unsure.

However, I do agree that people tend to underestimate these sorts of impacts. More ethanol use == more dying people in Africa, for example. At least someone figured out before Bill Gates implemented his idea of using barges to steer hurricanes away from the SE and Caribbean that it would have apparently caused famine in the UK...


Comment: Re:I guess the FDA hates birds (Score 1) 265

Dear FDA, Please consider the ecological side-affects. With mosquito repellent & decent medical care most humans can survive mosquito born illness, but birds and other bug-eaters will starve.

You left out mosquito repellent manufacturers and decent medical care providers.

Comment: Re:= $912,000,000,000 (Score 1) 247

by aviators99 (#48884259) Attached to: Dish Network Violated Do-Not-Call 57 Million Times

There will be a fine, but I'll be surprised if it ends up being more than even $30M.

I think you're right. But basically what that means is that they will only be penalized for 1,875 of 57,000,000 calls. Sends a clear message: please violate this law -- you won't be penalized for 3/1000th of one percent of them.

Comment: Re:math (Score 2) 181

by aviators99 (#48813901) Attached to: Tesla To Produce 'a Few Million' Electric Cars a Year By 2025

It's very likely that the people with money to buy a Tesla make too much to qualify for the tax credit.

Everyone qualifies for the BEV tax credit. There is no income qualification other than that you've had to pay enough tax to be able to use the tax credit. So it's possible that you make too *little* to use the tax credit; not too much. I actually had to manufacture tax spend to make sure that I could use it. I paid my property taxes earlier than I would have so that it would be in the right tax year.

Comment: How much bandwidth *do* they have? (Score 1) 219

by aviators99 (#48765667) Attached to: FBI: North Korean Hackers "Got Sloppy", Leaked IP Addresses

I read here that they have a single IPv4 block.

At 100mb/s (with nothing else using it) it would take 3 months to download the "100TB" that is said to have been downloaded. At 10mb/s it would take 30 months. (All approximate). This is end-to-end bandwidth, including all of the hops in between, like these proxies (for when they weren't sloppy).

Comment: Re:Drake equation (Score 3, Insightful) 219

by aviators99 (#48277993) Attached to: Most Planets In the Universe Are Homeless

This impacts Drake equation and might shed light as to why we have not detected any other sentient life in the universe.

No, it does not impact the Drake equation at all. The drake equation is based on R* and f(p) which are the the "rate of star formation" and the "fraction of those stars that have planets" (from your link on wikipedia). Both of these numbers are not affected by this finding.

Comment: Re:Tesla wasn't the target, it was China (Score 1) 256

by aviators99 (#48212599) Attached to: Michigan Latest State To Ban Direct Tesla Sales

Reinforcing an already existing ban was to make sure foreign markets don't try to muscle in and sell direct.

The last minute change to the law was to change one word; the word that caused Massachusetts to lose the case against Tesla. This had nothing to do with foreign cars.

Comment: Re:So now he has no nose? (Score 1) 161

by aviators99 (#48201719) Attached to: Cell Transplant Allows Paralyzed Man To Walk

(Forgive me. The first image that came to mind when I read this story was the movie "Sleeper", when they were trying to clone the assassinated leader using his nose.)

Yes, I am shocked at the lack of quotes from "Sleeper" in here.

"I've seen him shoot a nose!"
"Checking the [nose] cell structure!"

Comment: Re:Hmm, strong evidence of null-activity by NSA? N (Score 3, Insightful) 20

by aviators99 (#47863935) Attached to: Research Finds No Large-Scale Exploits of Heartbleed Before Disclosure

"... our detector" = "strong evidence of a negative we're trying to prove..."

It's interesting how one detector can be "strong evidence" that the NSA didn't do something in secret, I think.

The research had nothing to do with the NSA (the article about the research decided to bring them up). To me, the main objective of the study was to see if the widespread revocation of certificates in a short period of time was really warranted. IMO, it was not, and my opinion seems to be validated by this study.

It *is* possible to prove this sort of negative (I'm not saying they did). For example, if you wanted to prove that heartbleed was not used on a particular system, you could set up logging in advance. You could then extend that to multiple systems, and so on. My point is that you can't use the "you can't prove a negative" argument for things like this (and also that the NSA had nothing to do with this study).

Comment: Re:...really? (Score 1) 157

by aviators99 (#47828583) Attached to: Tesla's Next Auto-Dealer Battleground State: Georgia

Simple solution: they can see them in the showroom, and buy them online..

This is already Tesla's model. You can't buy a car at the showroom; only online. Each showroom has at least one Mac you can use however you want, and an employee will help you if you have any questions. But you can't pay there.

"What is wanted is not the will to believe, but the will to find out, which is the exact opposite." -- Bertrand Russell, _Sceptical_Essays_, 1928