thebargz said "more mass is definitely not what is needed".
It depends which car you're in. Passengers in an SUV hitting a SMART car head-on are much more likely to survive than are the passengers in the SMART. The SUV will slow suddenly but the SUV will go into reverse suddenly.
Why do people pay thousands of dollars for watches? I suspect that watches retain an unwarranted cachet from the time when it was extremely difficult to craft an accurate watch (ditto pens). You can buy an attractive and extremely accurate watch for a few hundred dollars.
Malcolm Turnbull just became Prime Minister in the last few hours. I have mixed feelings about him, but he's very strong on internet technology, having bought shares in what become Australia's largest ISP for 500,000 AUD, becoming chairman of the company, and selling them later for 57,000,000. He has to downsize to the Prime Minister's residence, poor guy.
Hopefully he can break Australia's history of very poor internet policy.
Prior to Turnbull being Communications Minister we've had some shockers, with Alston and Conroy being the at the bottom of that very deep bucket. I have hope.
That would be the M5 with 412 kW, and 0-100 time of 4.2s, capable of 300 km/h (artificially limited to 250 km/h) and great handling? Probably some of those Porsches were a little faster but the M5 is a great car. Essentially I agree with you, but it isn't like a regular family car with a great driver can beat a supercar with a competent driver (in case that was what you meant, but you probably didn't.)
P.S. Someone please buy me a Mercedes AMG C63 S.
Huh? That was their point.
In January 2013 I visited Beijing, Xi'an, and Guangzhou. Beijing was almost unbearable, with the US embassy reporting "PM 2.5" levels over 750. I went to one of those bars that are famed for their views - couldn't see a damned thing. I live in Melbourne Australia where levels are usually well under 10 and I was shocked by my experience. I felt sorry for the local population, thinking most locals would lose a decade of life.
I'm glad that the Chinese government has been taking this seriously since then. Xi'an was also terrible but not as bad as Beijing when I visited, but I was only there for a short time and it seemed as if the local pollution depended on how still the winter air was. Guangzhou was much better.
And yes, many Chinese do smoke, often removing their face masks to do so. Go figure.
AC said "Also you then need to figure out what makes them not drunk-drive. If its the easy booking by phone, well taxis can be ordered by phone so the reduction in recent years might be attributed to the easy book-by-smartphone app"
The article specifically refers to new year's eve. Taxi wait times on NYE are hours. I didn't read the article (as if!) but I expect it referred to Uber increasing supply on NYE. Statically licensed taxis cannot respond to huge peaks the way that Uber can.
Here in Melbourne Australia, I was shocked to discover that taxis aren't properly insured. http://www.theage.com.au/victo...
Perhaps things have changed since that article was written, but I drive past the 'taxi club' frequently, so I suspect not. If not, why would we want to prevent Uber form operating here. Unless I hear valid reasons I support Uber operating, and I'll be interested in the possible motivation of politicians against it.
Even Win32 is horrid. I was used to Unix programming and most system calls seemed sensible - pretty much what you expected them to be. Presumably Dave Cutler's mind works differently to mine. Windows API seems just weird to me.
So does it distinguish between rain and urine? I expect not.
So pedestrians get a sideways-shower due to rain bounce-back? Very bad idea if so.
When you make your mark in the world, watch out for guys with erasers. -- The Wall Street Journal