RTFA - he was found gulity of reverse domain name hijacking, which isn't stealing a PTR record as one might think, but accusing someone of domain squatting when you demonstrably know they aren't squatting (in this case because they offered it to you).

I also fail to find any reference to a settlement.
RP: Give me both A and B, or else.
Owners: It's our property. You can buy A or get B for free.
RP: Else!

That's not a settlement.

Next thing you'll tell us that the pope is a catholic.

And in a free market they should be allowed to ask whatever price they want, whether two zorkmids or half a tonne of diamonds.

The price has nothing whatsoever to do with the issue here, which was whether Ron Paul had a right to the domains. He did not show that he did.

Not if you claim it can be convered from one base to another. Then the base must have a way to represent it, and unary doesn't (unless, as said, someone manages to square the circle).

In base 0, all numbers are equal, real or not. 0*N = 0 for every possible value of N. This makes base 0 rather useless for mathematics, of course, but it's a valid philosophical concept, a relative to atheistic solipsism.

Unary is still very much in use. Nearly every child starts by counting fingers, and often we still count by making a mark for each thing we count.
Yes, unary doesn't have a way of representing reals, which means that pi can only be represented if someone manages to square the circle. Otherwise, you're stuck with fractions and other representations based on whole numbers. The concept of an exact pi only exists outside the unary system.

As for base 0, it most certainly can represent all real numbers. In fact, it cannot not do so. But there's no way to convert pi from base 0 to any other base.

Most bases. Not base 1 (unary), base 0 or base -1.

No, pi is pi in all bases equal to or higher than two, provided you assume euclidian geometry.
If you meant that pi is 3.14159265358979323846... only because of base 10, you're correct (again, as long as you ignore relativity and curved space).

Paper cartridges have a long history, and are still in use for shotgun shells and rubber (i.e. plastic) bullets.

That depends on your definitions. Blood and urine conducts electricity, yet won't trip the metal detectors at an airport.

Let's not forget that Sony's Android watch has been out for quite some time now, and is slightly less clunky than the pebble too.
I don't know whether it's been rooted yet (by others than Sony...), but if it hasn't, it's just a question of time.

Me, I prefer to use a watch that does the primary function quite well - tell the time without requiring me to use my fingers, and no matter whether it's night or snow or direct sunshine or underwater or on a bike or I haven't given maintenance to it in months. It's just there, does its job, and I can depend on it doing so.

The capital S was not unintentional.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solaria

In short, it's a symbol for a future utopia (or dystopia, depending on who you ask) where isolationism is taken to the extreme, and privacy laws are absolute. What you present to the outside world is what you want to present, and what you want to hide, you have the full right to hide. As long as you stay within the borders of your home and property.

As any Trekkie knows, it'll be transparent aluminum anyhow.

On the plus side, the erosion of an illusion of privacy in public will accelerate Solarisation. Our homes will eventually become our bastions, which we will rarely leave. There will be no need to, and too many privacy implications if we do.

That probably rules out getting Peter Davidson back then, eh? He's just wasted on Law and Order, and desperately needs a character role.

"At the wrong house" covers that, I think.