Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Comparing Apples to Apples (Score 1) 171

by aram.harrow (#26007989) Attached to: A Quantum Linear Equation Solver
What I'm wondering is whether similarly relaxing the requirements on the classical computation (so that you only require such an approximate solution in the same sense, not an exact solution) will reduce the classical computational complexity of the problem significantly.

We plan to soon update our arxiv post to explain that the matrix inversion problem (with the parameters we consider) is BQP-complete, meaning it is as hard as anything that quantum computers can solve in polynomial time. This is strong evidence that classical computers need exponentially more time to solve the problem in general. Of course, there may be special cases, some of practical interest, where good classical algorithms exist.

Fundamentally, there may be no basis for anything.

Working...