Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?

Comment: So much feedback and yet Microsoft ignores it all (Score 1, Insightful) 112

by angryargus (#48200561) Attached to: Microsoft Introduces Build Cadence Selection With Windows 10

The amount of feedback isn't surprising, but I would be surprised if anyone in the Redmond bubble ever made any changes (even slight) in response to any of that feedback. By the time they have a public release they're too far along in their big-company release process to accomodate changes.

Comment: Re:Only "discovered" someone's discover, nothing m (Score 1) 357

by angryargus (#46618931) Attached to: An Engineer's Eureka Moment With a GM Flaw

I certainly agree that a redesign isn't a smoking gun. This does have the potential to also work against the public's best interest. E.g., an engineer could propose a change to improve reliability of a part or that might potentially increase safety. Management then refuses the change because someone else might later "discover" the change and use it in litigation against the company as "proof" that it was a known defect.

Comment: Windows 8 support ends in 2 years (Score 2) 470

MSFT must agree Win 8 is shit, which is why its support is ending in just 2 years in January 2016. The preinstall aspect must explain why its market share grew despite the pending doom.

This is being handled differently than Vista SP1, which was really a disguised upgrade of Vista to Server 2008's codebase but it didn't involve an actual heavyweight OS upgrade & software reinstall (which seems to be the case for going from Win 8 to 8.1).

Comment: RSA is poor quality, as VMware learned (Score 2) 128

by angryargus (#44914649) Attached to: RSA Warns Developers Not To Use RSA Products

There's the proverb about not attributing to maliciousness that which can be explained by stupidity.

VMware (also an EMC subsidiary) used an RSA implementation for their SSO product. It had a ton of problems and bugs, and each new patch release introduced more bugs. Applying pressure to RSA via EMC didn't help, so VMware ripped out the RSA implementation with a band new in-house implementation.

Comment: Re:not surprising (Score 2, Informative) 280

There's a big difference between Windows where problems are a corner case, vs. Linux where success is a corner case. But the point still remains that I've used sleep and hibernate on most of my Windows machines without really fearing problems or data loss (I'll still save any progress before initiating it, though thanks to Office 97 I'm in the habit of saving regularly regardless), but I can't think of even bothering to try such a thing on Linux (nor can even of the people I know who love Linux enough to actually enjoy updating to a new distro every few months/years). I probably won't even think of trying to use sleep or hibernate on a Linux box until I see that the Linux kernel has developed drivers models that have some hint of being designed with power management in mind. Heck even the PCI driver model in Linux doesn't fit the spec well. Most Linux drivers I've had to deal with need to mess with the device's PCI configuration space themselves, whereas on Windows that's pretty rare because it's usually handled by the core kernel (which was the intent of the PCI spec based on how it's written).

Comment: Several problems to fix (Score 0) 1154

by angryargus (#41264197) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: How Would You Fix the Linux Desktop?

Don't require someone to be a compiler or makefile or package expert to "install" an app, get X to perform decently on a heavily loaded system, get power management/sleep/hibernate to perform decently/reliably, and don't make it a pain to do basic configuration changes like change screen resolution. Also stop thinking that having so many distros doing things in different ways is a good idea. I prefer MSFT's one set of rules over the chaos and disorganization of Linux.

Comment: Re:Wake on Lan? (Score 1) 163

by angryargus (#32557096) Attached to: Microsoft's Sleep Proxy Lowers PC Energy Use

WoL doesn't have to a specific packet. On Windows you have a choice between a magic packet (which is special), or just allowing the system to wake on any ARP or IP packet that's sent to the system's IP address. What was added in Windows 7 was a way for NICs to respond to ARP, ping, NDP while the system is in low power so the system doesn't wake for these. Seems like MSFT research should have factored this into their, um, "research".

The other thing they added was that waking on ARP/IP has historically been designed around using a sequence of bits and a mask as a filter to decide which frames should wake the system. This approach was changed so that more generic concepts like "TCP SYN" can be used to match packets. The difference is that you need multiple filters to handle TCP frames that use different extension lengths, while the latter approach only needs one.

Factorials were someone's attempt to make math LOOK exciting.