Slashdot stories can be listened to in audio form via an RSS feed, as read by our own robotic overlord.

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

Comment: Re:Relative terms. (Score 1) 311

by amorsen (#49070399) Attached to: Nuclear Plant Taken Down In Anticipation of Snowstorm

Insults do not help your arguments.

If you don't use nuclear power (once the power station is built) you lose it. Exactly the same as solar and wind. You can turn solar and wind off if you want, exactly the same as nuclear power, but economic reasons make it infeasible to do so very often, again exactly the same as nuclear power.

Nuclear power is notoriously difficult to integrate into the grid; you need a lot of fossil fuel or hydro plants to handle the peak load that nuclear cannot handle economically.

Comment: Re:Not really changed (Score 1) 309

by amorsen (#49021551) Attached to: The IPCC's Shifting Position On Nuclear Energy

Norway is hydro limited by how much water they can store from spring and summer for the winter heating needs. Wind power in Scandinavia produces most power in winter, right when hydro reservoirs are closest to running dry. If Canada is similar, it can integrate amazing amounts of wind power into the hydro system.

Comment: Re:About time. (Score 1) 309

by amorsen (#49021501) Attached to: The IPCC's Shifting Position On Nuclear Energy

The cost of nuclear is paid for up front. Fuel is effectively free. If you have a nuclear power plant and do not run it at full capacity at all times, you are throwing away free money.

If you only run your nuclear reactor at 33% output on average, your price per kWh has tripled. This would not matter if nuclear power was cheap, of course.

Comment: Re:Linux distributions that don't use systemd (Score 1) 471

by amorsen (#48971953) Attached to: Systemd Getting UEFI Boot Loader

It is not a realistic prospect. For daemons, the automatic handling by systemd is so much of an advantage that we will see server software depending on it. It will have to be emulated by the other init daemons, and so far I have not seen any of them work in that direction.

For GUI stuff, GNOME is already partially dependent on systemd, and KDE is going that way too.

Comment: Re:Datacaps? (Score 1) 132

The only "throttling" you get is at peak times due to network congestion, but even then i'am still unable to see any service impact or major delay.

There is no excuse for having congestion in your network on a daily or weekly. It can happen once in a blue moon when a line becomes unexpectedly busy, but it should never be the normal mode of operations.

At least not in a pretend-first-world-country where it is easy to lay backbone fiber.

Comment: Re:call me skeptical (Score 1) 360

by amorsen (#48835575) Attached to: NASA, NOAA: 2014 Was the Warmest Year In the Modern Record

Of course there is. One powerful negative feedback is that CO2 lets less and less infrared radiation escape, so every new added CO2 atom in the atmosphere has less effect than the previous one -- it cannot block radiation which was already blocked by other CO2 atoms.

This is part of the reason why doubling of CO2 levels "only" causes a linear temperature rise. CO2 only has a logarithmic effect on the temperature.

Which is lucky. Anything more complex than bacteria would have trouble surviving the wild temperature swings that a linear correlation between CO2 and temperature would cause.

Comment: Re:SOME visitors (Score 1) 56

by amorsen (#48833351) Attached to: Google Finally Quashes Month-Old Malvertising Campaign

And then you try to open a mainstream news site, like the Washington Times article linked to earlier, and you are presented with a full-page list of sites the page wants to load content from. It turns out the CSS one is washtimes.com, and that is all that was actually required.

I wish requestpolicy would label links by how they got pulled in (CSS, image, script...)

Innovation is hard to schedule. -- Dan Fylstra

Working...