thats a very large generalisation and though i've no direct experience i would be very surprised if it holds up in a medical environment.
only if it was a very very crap spam filter.
most spam filters i've worked on use weightings and so when importing this information it would add a strong weighting for
that user against that mail and not so strong weighting against the mail for other users. Other users could have weighting
for this mail as ham which should cancel the weighting against not to mention many other mitigating factors.
a good spam checker rarely rules out a message on a single criterion.
only if its a very badly designed shared filter , it should be saying this is spam when sent to this domain/recipient
no no no , thats a special move in emacs that gives your cursor a rocket launcher
oops sorry , i didn't realise that iran was not a member of the arabic league . i assumed it was synonymous with muslim but it appears not to be.
however for the purposes of israeli hatred it doesnt seem to matter , as long as they are muslim.
and your comment will be judged by your cowardice.
racism is when someone treats someone different because the are from a specific race , in this instance i am alleging that an Israeli run website will be instinctively biased toward exaggeration of
facts that show Arabic people in a bad light.
i think it would take a special kind of ignorance to state publicly that Israel was not a country that had a predilection for racism.
have a look at the whois for debka
4, Hamaapilim St.
why should anyone trust news about Arabic interests that is published by people living in Israel ?
it would certainly suit Israeli interests to discredit the security of Iran and its the kind of racism that
seems to be all too common in Israel .
maybe in a computer game but in real life we have this thing called the geneva convention which all the sensible countries in the world have signed up to that prevents that sort of medieval behaviour.
the rest of the world is watching america waiting for china to finish you off.
hes been caught telling porkies twice already so it had to be one more than that .
this as far as i'm concerned is his third strike , come the next election , hes outta there.
also since when where lords allowed in the commons ?
and even a slashdot poster uses an incorrect quote twice a day
in soviet russia monopolies commission probes eu !
> In a couple of 60 million people
wow , that is a seriously open relationship
so you'll be sending me a login to your completely unrestricted NNTP server then ? no ? ok i'll stick with bittorrent then.
i dont know which internet you are surfing but round here its all turned to kittens