After all, if nobody wants it, the servers wouldn't be slammed and hard to get to.
Why not? Apparently it never needs maintenance, never runs out of gas, never takes any damage, and never gets dirty.
Can't happen. Animals like lobsters can't carry prion diseases.
I'm a chemist in the US, and I routinely use about five different taper sizes. Then again, I'm also a process chemist, so I routinely work on anything from 25 mL to 22 L or more.
My family had a computer for years (the first was a 286 around 1987) and about 1992 bought a fancy new 486 from Gateway. It was an even bigger day when Dad got us a 4X CD-ROM drive to replace the 1X that the computer came with. About the time we switched to Windows 95, Dad bought a copy of Encarta. Over the next few years, one or two more versions were purchased. We also got a copy of Encyclopaedia Britannica (don't ask me when) and one of something made by Grolier before the acquistion by Scholastic. My parents weren't against large volumes of printed references (they own a condensed OED) but Dad saw the potential of the CD format (DVD as well) right away. The fact that Encarta was much cheaper was a bonus.
He's gone in 2012. Seriously, he's retiring. Almost manged to get rid of him in 2006.
I used to have a tiny application that was a leet translator. Could translate into or out of leet with three varying degrees of complexity.
I'm sorry, "tends to be" isn't what I really meant. There have been many deserving laureates, but the questionable ones stick out more in the Peace category.
The Peace Prize tends to be a joke anyway. I mean, it's not like Kissinger or Arafat or Rabin or Peres work really stood the test of time.
I found that I enjoyed the old platforming side-scrollers more than Duke3D. How about getting rid of the FPS idea and making a 3D platformer instead? It can keep the humor and tone of Duke3D, but make it play like Ratchet and Clank. I'd be far more interested in that than DNF, which I have no interest in purchasing at all.
I've never really understood why I should get a smartphone. Sure, there are times it'd be nice to have the Internet capabilities, but I hate using a smartphone as, get this, a phone. I've got a 6-year old simple phone that just does that, making phone calls for the small amount I use my cell phone for. The plan is still dirt cheap for virtually unlimited calling. I don't use SMS of any kind, so why do I want any of that bundled in? The only thing I want a smartphone for is mobile internet. But no carriers seem to want to just sell me a data plan, even if I come to them with an unlocked phone they can support. And now that even more caps are going into place, my desire to spend multiple hundreds of dollars on a phone and a plan drops even more.
An anonymous reader writes "15 years after Novell sold the software to Corel, a court has given Novell the right to sue Microsoft over WordPerfect, which had a 50 percent market share in the early '90s."
It's partially a failure of connectivity on my part. The PS3 is hooked up through HDMI, but the TV then feeds the audio out through an optical connection through a Toslink-only switchbox into the receiver's single Toslink connection. The DVR hooks up the same way. This works fine when doing anything other than watching a Blu-Ray. I can't pass HDMI through the receiver as it only has a single Toslink and a single coax input.
For me, while I have a HDTV (32" 720p, definitely not the latest and greatest) and a Blu-Ray player (okay, it's a PS3), I have only bought two Blu-Ray discs. What has been stopping me--besides the fact that I buy very little physical media these days--is that my audio equipment doesn't work well with most Blu-Ray discs. I have a simple, but effective, 5.1 setup that works quite well for DVDs, video games, and anything broadcast or streamed in 5.1 as it has AC-3, DTS, and linear PCM support. But it doesn't support Dolby TrueHD or DTS-HD, and it seemed like the only support I got for Dolby Digital was 2.0, as if the audio wasn't passing through correctly. I don't want to spend more money on a new surround system, especially when the TV I currently have doesn't really make Blu-Ray worth it.
I really enjoyed the movie. However, I didn't even know about it until I saw the director on the Colbert Report, when I decided I wanted to see it. I wound up seeing it as a double-feature with Inglorious Basterds at a drive-in. The Hurt Locker was premiered back in 2008 and didn't get wide release until the last weekend of July 2009. I think I saw them both the weekend Inglorious Basterds released, at which point The Hurt Locker had been premiered almost a year earlier. Seriously, why sit so long on a movie for release?