I'd be willing to bet that 90% of the time this happens it's because a woman's put her handbag on the counter to get the wallet out, it's brushed up close against the sensor and activated it. Contactless is designed to be able to be used in a wallet, guessing distance is the big limiting factor, not having a couple of layers of cloth between them.

Apple had a youtube app long before then (it came with the original iphone).

IOS pre-dates Android and is of a size where removing Youtube hurts Google more than Apple. Anti-trust is when you abuse your size and power so the fact they didn't do this when they weren't in a position of power strengthens the case against them.

Google are dominant in the video hosting industry. They have been providing APIs and help to other platforms in order to to get youtube on there.

They've been refusing to provide MS will the same tools and help as other companies because they're a competitor in a different field.

Seems open and shut anti-trust

*Where's Wally

Yeah, who cares if one teenager got put through hell and the parents of another missing teenager experienced even more heartbreak, eventually they identified the real people (after seeing them identified by actual responsible news reporters) and had no noticeable impact on the man hunt!

The helicoptor was in an active combat zone. There were reports of RPG fire. The press were not wearing identifying uniforms that press in an active warzone are expected to wear. The children in the van were only visible when looking carefully at the footage and freeze framing, not in a combat situation (wtf were they doing driving children to the site of a bombing) and the van appeared to be insurgents recovering the weapons and preventing wounded combatants being captured.. There was an RPG launcher and an AK-47 clone visible in the footage (in addition to the pilots mistaking the camera for another RPG). The pilots waited for authorisation before firing.

As tragic as it was, procedure was followed and there a combination of circumstances contributed to the mistake. It was not a war crime.

Your point? Those weren't from Manning, nor were they published alongside thousands of other documents.

aaaaand that was a reply to the wrong post.

Can I have your birth records? Your school history? Your tax returns? Criminal record? Oh heck, anything you've ever done that has received any sort of government funding or subsidy? You should be fine with that right?

There's a big difference between 'whistleblowing on a crime' and 'leaking every single thing you have access to in the hope that some of it may be criminal'.

I like Bitstamp personally. Largely because they do SEPA payments with a fairly low fee.

Everyone go to bitstamp to buy lots of bitcoins!

*moves finger from 'pump' button to 'dump' button*

The figures are excluding ultra portables, tablets and convertible laptops.
Hard to take these figures seriously when they exclude pretty much all the big growth areas for PC sales.

Having a couple of officers do undercover work to get the organisers is more efficient and effective then sending loads of officers to a concert, filling up the cells and having a high chance of the organisers getting away. It's also far more likely to discourage people from even attempting a show.

Plus there's lots of stuff that goes with the concerts other than just noise; poor safety, drink driving, general vandalism to the area, all the stuff that licenced concerts have to plan for or try to prevent.

The article states that they were all sent out on the same date. It's probably safe to assume that they were all taken to the post office or mail handlers at the same time.

There's no way of knowing if the samples arrived at the post office in separate, pre-sorted atheist/unmarked piles/sacks or if the post office then decided to sort them by markings themselves. Having samples done at different times can eliminate data 'bunching up' or samples interfering with each other.