Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
For the out-of-band Slashdot experience (mostly headlines), follow us on Twitter, or Facebook. ×

Comment: Re:what is Google's strategic intent here? (Score 1) 343 343

Moblin was just trying to jump start this market. Whilst Intel have optimized it for their chips, it will soon support ARM. Moblin's main differentiation is its Clutter based UI which already supports OpenGL ES (as used by PS3, iPhone, Android, and Symbian; not an Intel chip in sight).

They want to make a bigger pie, not just take a bigger slice.

Comment: Things Change! (Score 1) 1089 1089

It used to be browsers used the native windowing system to popup a new window all the time. Then they put some security in to stop this being so annoying. Then they switched to mainly just opening a new 'tab' themselves (which doesn't involve the WM). Finally getting ride of the WM all together and managing their own dialogs seems the next logical step.

In fact browsers already include WM functionality in order to embed plug-ins into their own layout.

Comment: Re:Worthless humans... (Score 1) 147 147

Monkey Island suffers against more recent games because it had no voice (and http://speechproject.mixnmojo.com/ is far from complete). The voice acting in DotT is as good as the day it was released and running under http://www.scummvm.org/ with hq3x filtering gives you brilliant graphics that are true to your nostalgic memories. Now a sequel would be cool...

Comment: Re:Battle with what? (Score 1) 141 141

They DO run Linux/BSD with custom modifications. No way is either Google or Amazon reinventing the wheel and writing their entire stack from scratch, nor paying anyone a per-server license.

The problem is it still isn't Open Source. They are not redistributing the software so do not need to release the source. (And because no one else would have the hardware to run it in the way they do, they wouldn't get any benefit if they did)

Comment: Been done DocBook or DITA (Score 1) 338 338

If you want your structure and presentation intertwined then use ODF.

If you want them separated:

For structure use the book inspired DocBook, or the journal inspired (and generally more flexible) DITA.

To format either of these for presentation (either on screen or in print) you can either use an adaptive layout with HTML+CSS or a predetermined layout with XSL:FO.

Can't think of any way of avoiding CSS as all three solutions use it.

Comment: Re:Do these benchmarks make any sense? (Score 1) 102 102

You need benchmarks to reflect your real world use. If you always run your benchmarks on idling systems then filesystems with on the fly compression would usually win. However they are not popular because this isn't a good trade off for most people. Parallel BZIP2 compression sounds a good choice as it should stress memory and CPU, whilst giving a common IO pattern, and a fairly low inherent performance variance. Obviously you are looking for a fairly small variance in performance, and the are a lot of other factors that must be accounted for before the results have any significance. Not publishing their data pretty much guarantees they don't know what they are doing.

TRANSACTION CANCELLED - FARECARD RETURNED

Working...