So you admit that PC games are created so well that they can be enjoyed for years and years while most console gamers await the yearly refresh of their favourite titles like the morons that they are.
Nope, what I'm saying is that PC gamers are cheap bastards who play de_dust, not because CS is a greatest game evah, but because they are cheap bastards who spent too much on hardware which makes them less willing to blow money on software. Besides, each time they play de_dust they're doing the same basic thing over and over.
while most console gamers await the yearly refresh of their favourite titles like the morons that they are.
If the yearly title has more features, and is better than the previous version, why not? I'm not talking about COD/Battlefield/Sports games...that is a relatively recent development. Sure I could have played a map in SOCOM over and over, but SOCOM II was a better game.
I mean consoles get linear FPS games like CoD,
Which has also been on PC since the beginning of the franchise, and was more popular on PC than console till relatively recently
while PCs get thinking FPS games like Deus Ex.
Oh you mean that game I played on the PS2? The one that also has mouse (and keyboard) support if you want it? What, you didn't know about the PS2 version? Filthy PC Gamers...you think you know gaming but all you know is your moms basement and de_dust or the Barrens. That is why I say that console gamers know more about PC gaming than PC Gamers do about console gaming.
Consoles get simplistic kiddie garbage RPGs like "Final Fantasy", while the PC has Ultima.
Ha! Early RPG's like Ultima were just as linear as Final Fantasy, you were expected to go through the dungeons in a particular order and often couldn't go places without doing certain quests to gain "passage" or permits or what have you.
Besides, who says console gamers didn't get to play Ultima. Several Ultima games were ported to various consoles. Even Ultima Underworld got a PSone port in Japan. But of course, living in the PC gaming ghetto, you never knew that. I know about Richard Garriot but I bet you can't name the producer for the early Final Fantasy's.
Consoles don't get strategy games, due to lack of proper controls and lack of brainpower to go behind those controls.
You remind me of Desslock, PC Gamer magazines former RPG guy, who once thought consoles didn't have any strategy games or RPG's because he didn't recognize any of the titles. Consoles have their OWN games in those genres and of course you don't know about them because you're thinking: "No Europa whatever, or Civ-foo? Consoles don't have any strategy games then." rather than actually checking to see what they do have.
due to lack of proper controls and lack of brainpower to go behind those controls.
I'm old enough to remember when the oldbie PC gamers who started on the gold box games lambasted the fratboys playing DOOM/Heretic etc as brainless casuals. There are plenty of cerebral games on consoles, but since you're in the PC Gamer Ghetto, you don't know about them.