That argument fails because Congress “does not alter the fundamental details of a regulatory scheme in vague terms or ancillary provisions.” Whitman v. American Trucking Assns.
France should just socialize the indexing of web content from their ip ranges. They should make it illegal to index the range. Then sell the index to search providers. (with a limited license that they can revoke)
DMCA is a result of a treaty between the USA and Germany. A treaty that was approved by both elected governments. France should push for a global censorship treaty if they want to effect American search results.
lol I didn't learn that process till I ruined a computer turning it off with the power switch on the back.
It is prior restraint on speech. This is generally unconstitutional.
It isn't just consumer-grade gear that has it. I worked at a copy shop 10 years ago and the color copier could detect money.
They would of been better off adding an adjective in front of the 8 planets that clear their orbits. Primary Planets or some such.
I'm not going to knock it till I try it. I have watched people at work before and learned little things.
It has been true prior to the invention of the internet. Businesses have been keeping personal data on customers for thousands of years. That data is always part of the sale of the company. Companies buy each other to get the other companies customers. You can't purchase customers without transferring customer data. Management of a company can change at any time. So even if the name on the site doesn't change your data may wind up in the hands of new people.
They should start small and do a condom that is also a pregnancy test.
According to the Chief Justice their are multiple drafting mistakes in the law. So number 1 was decided in court by 6 experienced Judges. Number 2 does not make any sense. If they wanted to force states to setup their own exchanges they would not provide the federal option at all. Your interpretation is also likely unconstitutional. (Federal Government is required to treat citizens the same regardless of what state they live in.)
If Congress wants to repeal the law then they should go and do that. Congress can change the law whenever it wants. It isn't the Supreme Courts job to ignore 99% of the text of a law and toss out laws they don't like because of typos.
You can't count on using a one sentence drafting error in a large law to alter the whole laws meaning.
In fact everyone needs one for herd immunity.
We are targeting stupid poor people. I'm not a doctor. I haven't done experiments to see if my elixir works. We leave the right of choice to our customers.