Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Yes and no. (Score 1) 97

by Zerathdune (#17989338) Attached to: Are AV False Positives Hurting You?

I don't know any anti virus software package good enough to tell them apart from each other
AVG. It has won awards, including the VB100, which, from the VB100 site:

In order to display the VB100 logo, an anti-virus product must have demonstrated in our tests that:

* It detects all In the Wild viruses during both on-demand and on-access scanning.
* It generates no false positives when scanning a set of clean files.

The product must fulfil these critera in its default state.
In addition, AVG is efficient enough that you can actually do other things while it's scanning with no noticeable slowdown. I couldn't be happier with it. Oh, and it's free for personal, non-commercial use.
Microsoft

Why "Upgrade" To Office 2007 598

Posted by Hemos
from the a-question-asked-everywhere dept.
walterbyrd writes "IMO: Office-2007 is a contender for the least useful upgrade in the history of computing. It's expensive, has a steep learning curve, and it's default format is even less compatible with anything else. Stan Beer discusses the "upgrade" in his article: Question: why do I need to upgrade to Office 2007?."
Security

Journal: McAffee, You worry me.

Journal by Zerathdune
I've been using McAffee Security Center on my windows box since january, when my previous subscription expired. it comes free from my ISP, so I figured I'd give it a try. I'm still using it so far, but every now and then there are little things that make me worry, make me wonder if it wouldn't be worth paying for a service that I'm more comfortable with, even if it's just for piece of mind.

All life evolves by the differential survival of replicating entities. -- Dawkins

Working...