Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Does not Affect Prior Art Doctrine (Score 1) 362

by Xiroth (#35437934) Attached to: Senate Passes Landmark Patent Reform Bill

Err, that's specifically what this is designed to solve. If you can show that prior art existed in public before the patent was filed, the patent is void. End of story.

Whereas currently, you have to prove that the patent troll didn't invent the item before the prior art existed. So you've got to go into this complicated discovery process to prove things one way or another. The first-to-file system solves a lot of the he-said she-said nature of current lawsuits as everything relevant is on the public record, simplifying them significantly.

Australia

Australian Court Rejects Copyright Demands on ISPs->

Submitted by
Xiroth
Xiroth writes "The Australian Federal Court has rejected Australian copyright body AFACT's demands that ISPs act as enforcers regarding copyright infringement on their networks. The challenge to their demands was brought by ISP iiNet, which refused to comply with AFACT's demands and referred their lawyers to the police. The Court sided with iiNet that it is indeed the responsibility of the police to enforce the law, and that ISPs have no responsibility in these matters unless issued with a court order or are found to have actively 'authorised' acts of infringement."
Link to Original Source
Robotics

Watch the World's First Bipedal Robot Marathon->

Submitted by
kkleiner
kkleiner writes "History is in the making in Japan, as humanoid robots compete to see who will be the first to run a full length marathon (26.2 miles/42.2km). You can watch the whole thing live on UStream, even taking a glance through the eyes of one of the competitors! Organized by Vstone, makers of the Robovie line of small scale robots, the “Robomara Full” or Robot Challenge will take place over three days from February 24th through the 27th in Osaka. In order to win a bot must complete 422 laps of a 100 meter course outlined on the 11th floor of Osaka’s ATC building."
Link to Original Source

Comment: Re:More interesting, mimics Apple app store (Score 1) 222

by Xiroth (#34772898) Attached to: Amazon To Launch 'Amazon Appstore For Android'

Precisely. The advantage that Android retains over developing for iOS devices, though, is that if Amazon shoot down your application on whatever grounds (such as what happens with Apple), you can always be sure that you'll be able to find another app store to publish through.

What I think that we'll see is 'tiered' app stores - Amazon and perhaps a couple of other companies will run the top tiered app stores where everything is carefully checked and things like pornography is not allowed; then Google and a couple of other companies will run mid-tier app stores which allow pornography and run a relatively small amount of malware-checking; and then there'll be bottom-tier app stores which sell whatever to whoever, including completely illegal software. At least this means that developers won't be completely left out in the cold, although obviously the higher-tier store, the better for most things.

Comment: Re:How about... (Score 1, Insightful) 265

by Xiroth (#34544054) Attached to: Statistical Analysis of Terrorism

There's no doubt that Bin Laden is a fervent Islamist fundamentalist. Without doubt, he will not be satisfied with anything less than the subjugation and conversion of the entire world to Islam. The real question, though, is how does he continue to attract so many followers and so much support? The vast majority of people, no matter their religion, are perfectly happy spending their life living as best they can (being the "sheeple" that some around here seem to detest so much) - they wouldn't have anything to do with such dangerous ideology if there wasn't something driving them to do it. The way that those who want peace can win is by leaving fanatics left all alone.

Comment: Re:Conscience votes (Score 1) 254

by Xiroth (#33610044) Attached to: Conroy Still Hell-Bent On Internet Filter

I'd beg to differ, to be honest. Voting for your representative rather than your party sounds nice, and in fact before the previous election I supported the idea. Unfortunately, having that situation turn into a reality (3 independents now hold the balance of power here in Australia) has shown what that leads to: pork and unreliable ability to deliver the policies that the party was elected on. I hear a lot of Americans complain about the incompetence of their government; have you ever considered that perhaps it's because of the every-man-for-himself style of legislative body you have? Where every representative has to spend all of their time trying to wrangle things for their seats, as otherwise their seats would get nothing? What if all money spent in a state was purely on the basis of nation-wide policy, rather than individual bits of cash added into legislation purely to benefit the representative's chances of being voted back in? Maybe you wouldn't have so much ineffectiveness in your government

I'm not saying that our system doesn't have problems - far from it, and in many ways the US does it better. But I think that legislating for a whole nation rather than just bits of is a much better fit for a federal legislative body.

Those who educate children well are more to be honored than parents, for these only gave life, those the art of living well. -- Aristotle

Working...