Do you mean an appeal to authority fallacy? If you do then it is not.... that fallacy is about appealing to an authority that is not really an authority.
If a business is breaking the law as part of their business model(and this includes DRM,.... as much as I may disagree with those laws) then it is the same situation as a bakery not making a cake for a gay couple. And they should both be punished. How is it a thought crime when the bakery(and I am talking about the one in question that was in the news) said that they are not making a cake for a gay couple specifically because they are gay?