Is it really appropriate to use average wages, instead of median wages? The average wage doesn't change if everyone takes a huge pay cut while a CEO ends up giving himself a 1000-percent raise.

Java is an OK language, but it's kind of bureaucratic and boring. I can't think of a better way to suck all the magic out of a fantasy game than to have the spells written in Java---except maybe having the kids produce an ER diagram and a set of tables in Boyce-Codd normal form.

At the very least, they could do without the pointless punctuation. Does a spell really have to have semicolons and empty parentheses to denote that the spell is imperative?

If they don't email me a phone number attached as a word document, then they're more welcome than the usual idiots I have to see on my computer.

Baby boomers or not, the number of PhD graduates far exceeds the number of professors due to the simple logistics of teaching. Suppose you start a professorship at 30, and retire at 70. How many PhD students do you advise per year? Let's say 1.5 just to be on the low side. And suppose they each take 5 years to graduate. You just cranked out a dozen PhDs, and created one faculty opening by retiring. One should expect an advanced degree to increase one's job prospects, but it's numerically silly to expect, specifically, a faculty position. This is why every university hires people with degrees from an even better university---not because NIU frowns on NIU grads, but because the market for the teacher's job is so competitive that only the best CVs get in.

No matter how sophisticated the algorithm, the set of strings that get graded an A is bound to contain some weird and illegible elements. They probably won't be too hard to find by inspection of the algorithm and its training data. It will only take a few widely publicized examples of meaningless essays with a high auto-grade to cast doubts on this method of grading, no matter how effective it is in the common case.

I put the contest rules in a pdf, at http://bingweb.binghamton.edu/~scraver/underhanded/ until the main site is back up again.

This is a mistake, and I will fix it when the site is up again.

Thanks. I fixed that, so at least one thing is online.

Hi, I was not aware of this. I will announce an alternate prize for people outside the US, if we can figure out what web site is friendly with gift certificates in other countries (Amazon?)

It is indeed a terribly redundant use of cat, but not useless: it makes it easier to read, by placing the command line invocation by itself at the end of the line.

Billy doesn't have the choice between (a) saving up or (b) financing the whole dang thing with loans.

Most of us will (c) take out loans to pay for part of college, and cover the rest by working before and throughout college, including summer internships; by choosing an affordable school, rather than one that costs over 20K/year; by making choices like not living in a dorm for all four years; and by not paying for graduate school out of your own pocket (it is rarely economical to do so.) I did these things, and ultimately got as far as a Ph.D. with a total loan burden on the order of 20K.

As I said, it seems like a cultural problem: people don't seem to understand that they can and must do these things if they are broke. Instead they think their only choice is a massive loan sufficient to finance an entire four-year degree.

Maybe it's because you're borrowing over 80,000 dollars for a college education.

5 minutes with a spreadsheet would tell you how much and for how long you have just screwed yourself, and by borrowing that kind of money you prove that you can't or won't spend even that much effort to think before borrowing.

I think part of the problem is cultural: I was broke back when I went to college, and I needed loans; but I also knew that you should never borrow anywhere near enough to pay your whole tuition bill. That's far too much money to borrow even if you aren't dead broke. Poverty forces you into indebtedness, but it also makes you paranoid about accumulated debt, and you understand that something that costs tens of thousands of dollars will require you to eat Ramen, work multiple jobs, and make affordable choices even if someone will extend you credit.

But now I hear horror stories about students who borrow enough money to buy a house in much of the USA, and use that to pay for an entire four-year degree plus graduate school. It's like the kids don't understand that they're poor; they get a credit line and stop acting like people who have to work for a living.

True, but let's not conflate "what conservatives don't like" with "what was prevented." Conservatives don't like the destruction of embryos, period.

The federally funded variety was just the one type that the Bush administration had the political will to stop.

On top of that, conservatives tend to be wary of other acts that don't involve the destruction of an embryo, but are conceptually close. For example, conservatives often oppose emergency contraception, some even regular contraception. I would not be surprised if many conservatives were opposed to research on existing embryonic stem cell lines.