Comment: Re:Anyone stupid enough to use AT&T (Score 1) 328
Apparently none of my devices are GSM, then.
|
|
Apparently none of my devices are GSM, then.
You forget rod cells.
Here's another interesting point...
Our eyes are not particularly good in the dark, and yet at maximal dark adaptation, a single photon can trigger a response on the optic nerve. All it takes is that a photon cross and interact with a rod cell.
That's a pretty low energy event for us to detect... so based on that alone I toss out the "too low energy to be useful" aspect.
No, that's called selection pressure.
Evolution is what happens over the long term when selection pressures are applied.
You both know "wing" is the name of a group of fighters, right? Not just the component?
How does that work once your contract is terminated?
SIM card? What's that? I haven't seen one of those in a phone in years, over here.
That would be a credit card, not a cell phone bill.
But I thought your problem was the violence, not the injury? Just because he got stabbed or beaten instead doesn't mean the violence was any lesser. If anything it may have been worse - more savage.
What you don't seem to grasp is removing the gun doesn't remove the violence.
That's why you come up with some way to pull the trigger remotely
You flare the start of the barrel and make the cylinder a mating shape to it, and press the cylinder into this flare as part of the trigger pull.
This forces them into alignment and also forms somewhat of a seal, allowing less energy loss.
Seems like you could just 3d-print patterns for investment or lost-media casting, too. In fact, this guy does it in his yard.
Please tell me when the last time a party other than the Republicans or Democrats held any significant power.
No, taking guns away is not the "easiest way" because it does precisely nothing to prevent violence.
No problem is so formidable that you can't just walk away from it. -- C. Schulz