Given this court ruling, I can deduce one of two things about this case:
1) The TOS has been changed to no longer grant "the non-exclusive right to keep a permanent copy"
2) "deletion or modification is reasonably necessary to protect the consumer" from depictions of incest
I am so going to Dent this!
Then the actual article says the opposite of what the submitter is trying to get us to believe: "if you're downloading video and using multiple applications at the same time, an SSD will give you a very noticeable performance boost"