The dark night of Fascism is always descending on America, but it always falls on Europe.
Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
Now imagine if programmers were overpaid undertalented, super inflated egos, where glaring faults in code could be patched over with a public relations campaign?
You had me at 'overpaid'.
I've posted this before, but I want to get this idea out there:
Here's how to make your password truly secure, if you really have something you want to hide:
1) Get fifty dollar bills. Maybe get some fives and tens mixed in with them. Total cost less than $100.
2) Shuffle them into a random order.
3) Set your Truecrypt (or Veracrypt, or whatever) password to be the hundred-digit number formed by taking the two least significant digits of the bills' serial numbers, in order.
4) Keep the stack of cash next to your computer, and make sure you don't let it get out of order. If you lose - or even just drop - the stack, it's game over. If/when you find yourself starting to remember the password and able to enter it without referring to the stack, shuffle the stack and change your password.
5) If an adversary raids your house, chances are that the stack of cash will simply vanish into a pocket. And if that doesn't happen, odds are pretty good that the stack will be scrambled, especially if there are different denominations mixed in.
6) At this point, your password is well and truly gone. No amount of rubber hose cryptography can bring it back.
7) The best part about this plan is you don't have to actually do it. Your password can be your dog's name, as long as you're willing to stick to your story - and it helps if you actually keep a stack of cash next to your computer - that you did steps 1-4.
If you have a Verizon phone, there's no way to get rid of the Verizon crapware, other than the barely-legal nuclear option of rooting your phone. So if you're going to test Verizon, it's reasonable to have the crapware be part of the test.
Step 1: Acquire fifty one-dollar bills. If you're feeling especially rich, mix fives and tens in with them.
Step 2: Put them into a random order.
Step 3: Generate a password by taking the least significant two digits of each bill, in order, for a 100-digit number. Use this password to encrypt your data.
Step 4: Make sure that the bills never get out of order. Keep them in your desk drawer or another safe place.
Step 5: The cops raid your place. There is a decent chance that a small stack of cash would never make it into evidence, simply vanishing into an officer's pocket. Even if that doesn't happen, they'll catalog the money, sort it (here's where the fives and tens come in handy), and almost certainly get it out of order in the process.
Step 6: Your password is now gone. Unless the cops turned in the cash and kept it in order, it is impossible for you to tell them your password. If the bills make it into evidence, there are up to 50! (~200 bits) possible passwords. If not, there are 10^100 (~300 bits) possible passwords.
Step 7: Don't actually do steps 1-4. Just keep a small stack of cash next to your computer. Your actual password can be your cat's name. Just be willing to testify under oath that you did steps 1-4.
Almost 20,000 people died because they lived close to the ocean.
A few dozen people might wind up with cancer someday because Japan uses nuclear power.
The obvious conclusion? Nuclear power is bad and should be eliminated immediately.
Realistically, there are two useful languages you can speak.
The first one is the native language of wherever you're currently living.
The second one is English.
If you live in the Anglosphere, those are the same language.
Hmm. I'm pretty sure I have my 15-year-old copy of MSVC 1.52 around here somewhere. Might be worthwhile to use something like that rather than a current version downloaded from MSDN.
Honest question: I can buy powder-actuated tools here in the States. That is a powerful nailgun or similar tool that uses a small gunpowder charge to drive a nail into concrete, brick, or the like. Do you have anything like that in your country? Because the charges are basically super-low-power bullets without the lead part.
No, the bank can loan out 95 strawberries. If those 95 loaned strawberries are deposited in another bank, that bank can loan out (95*.95) strawberries. If those strawberries are loaned out, and deposited again, now we're up to (95*.95*.95) strawberries, and an equal number of strawberry IOUs. If this process happens an infinite number of times, eventually the number of strawberry IOUs will be 2000. But every single deposit or loan will have involved a real strawberry.
Again, the government actually can create fiat currency by taking a piece of paper and writing "$100" on it, but fractional reserve banking always balances inputs and outputs. And despite what somebody upthread implied, it's been around since the middle ages.
It's not quite that simple. Fractional-reserve banking creates promises of money out of thin air. You can do fractional-reserve banking with gold coins, barrels of oil, strawberries, or any other commodity.
Even that's not quite fair to say, because every promise of money created is created at the same time as a right to future money, so the total net amount of money isn't changed.
Many people get f-r banking and fiat currency confused.
Over the course of the 20th century, something like twenty million Europeans were murdered, mostly by their own governments.
In that same time frame, something less than one million Americans were murdered, mostly by fellow citizens.
If American-style gun ownership had reduced state-sanctioned murder by just 10%, even at the cost of creating American-style private murder rates, Europe would have come out ahead on the deal.
Learn some science.
Neither volcanoes nor streetlights put out
I don't know how it works over there, but in the United States, this would result in rich people being unable to drive a car without half a dozen cops following them and watching their every move, while poor people driving at 90 through a school zone would be utterly ignored.
Also, if I were a sufficiently rich person, I could hire a poor person to drive me to work. I could cut my commute time in half!