... the beginning of the printable weaponry. The Liberator.zip http://thepiratebay.sx/torrent/8458218/

The files are in stl format http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STL_(file_format)

Can be converted to other cad formats via Accutrans @ http://www.micromouse.ca/

Of course the applicable legal warning in printing this gun is in order here: It may be a federal crime to bear such arms. Though the founders of this country would tell you its a crime to violate the second amendment.

What choice are people making? Support the unknown and changeable laws on the fly of current democracy government or Support the written in stone, honored, well published and unchangeable papers written by the founders of this Republic for which it stands. The guns they used then were made by who? And what technology existed then to match round with barrel?

Let me suggest. For those who have a problem with the Second Amendment they need to be one upped and given a problem with their use of the First Amendment until they accept the Bill of Rights in whole, not as a pick and chose what parts they want!

Had the software industry not intentionally been falsely constraining the users.... what the users could do for themselves...

Anonymous to shut down the government web sites.

Hmmm, so obvious ....

....out of state drivers and leads to more property damage due to it.

State should be sued with a class action suit to recover the fines they have wrongly collected.

Hovernment does not know how to budget and Software is always behind schedule.
Put the two toigether and you'll not have any savings at all but a growing cost.

Between the printable weaponry and this printable cloak..... Maybe those who create enemies need to stop doing that.
Hmmm, now I wonder if mods will cloak me...

Hmmm, Slashdot seems to have had a glitch in posting....The above post I believed did not go through.... Maybe the glitch is patentable?

when software can be understood in terms of what is not patentable then software will no longer be patented.
http://abstractionphysics.net/pmwiki/index.php

http://abstractionphysics.net/pmwiki/index.php

...why youtube has been choking lately

....are they learning how pointless their job is? For certainly the mass majority of the population are of people just living their lives and should not be expense'd by the few looking for trouble.

....the government is failing and degrading itself in regards to what the founders established, foresaw and wrote in the Declaration of Independence.

What part of our security are we supposed to be trading for what other part? Or is it really who's security is being protected?
I.e. Financial Retirement Security (S.S.) compromised for warfare against ...... (who? Who next?) security. Security of liberty and freedom of the people sacrificed for the security of brute force government protection industry?

See the big picture and realize leading and provoking terrorism for corporate benefits does not support the various securities of the people.

Its very clear the government is for themselves ignoring the people, the taxpayers who pays for them.
Why should it take one or two to suppress the rights for the many and the many required to defend the rights, liberties and DUTIES the founders established for the people? The answer is simple when you realize who's benefit the government is acting for. Hint: its not the people!

A bully would only be wise to expect retaliation. Maybe the governments should stop being the worlds bully. And given the amount of money the governments of the world spend on warfare... you can easily see who is the biggest bully. And its seems to be that addiction is running out of others to bully and turning in on itself, or its people, as we have seen happen in other countries.

This is about "SECURITY" but is not the question really "Who's security?" The peoples or the bullies?

For those who do not yet know, political effort is now underway to regulate black powder using this event of a supposed two as an excuse.... just another in the continuing effort to disarm the people and violate the second amendment and lets not forget why the second amendment was written... or should it just be recognized its not a degradation of what the founders establish but a verification the founders were absolutely correct in foresight of the degradation of a government?

If everyone know teh secrets ... then the secrets are not secrets and as such become null and void of any value in being secret.

So how do you aid an enemy with a secret that is not secret? You don't, but only fool those who believe its a secret.

I do recall that some judge ruled that the US government, though the secrets are no longer secret, can still pretend they are.

So who is fooling who here?

Where does government get its funding from? And who is it that has a serious budgeting problem?

Ever hear of double speak or triple speak?

Any career politician will know it well. Well enough to avoid hate speech while committing genocide.
How many Iraqi Citizens where victims of "Collateral damage" and what speak was attached to the top command of that happening?

Hate speech data base? Its called "The other dictionary" when you realize abstract words can have meanings attached not in the standard dictionaries