Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?

Comment: On WSUS too now (Score 1) 324

by WaxlyMolding (#34144120) Attached to: MS Adds Security Suite To Update Service, Antivirus Rival Objects
I have seen Microsoft Security Essentials listed in my WSUS server for a couple of months now. I also have been installing it in place of whatever free AV was in place on systems I work on for friends and family. The software is lightweight and works well, and I have no problem with Microsoft doing this. The mess that is the Internet is partially thier fault, it's fair they should help clean it up.

Comment: Re:not sureprised (Score 1) 493

by JStegmaier (#30018130) Attached to: Did Microsoft Borrow GPL Code For a Windows 7 Utility?
Or is it that non-commercial violations of copyrights aren't that upsetting, but commercial violations are?

I don't remember a great many people rushing to the defense of the guy trying to sell Beatle's music by violating copyrights, even though he was going against a big label.

Comment: Re:McUnix (Score 2, Informative) 290

by WaxlyMolding (#26410255) Attached to: SCO Proposes Sale of Assets To Continue Litigation

SCO has a market cap of just over $3 million. IIRC, McDonald's Corp is one of their major customers. That $3mil is pocket change for the $66.95 billion market cap McD's Corp.

What if McDonald's buys SCO? McD's could hire a couple devs (since that is all SCO needs, apparently..) for maintenance and some support personnel, then service their own stores as well as other existing customers. Maybe they'd wind up saving, if not making, some money in a few years. Perhaps give Darl a store to manage...

Heh. :)

Point being, with a market cap of only $3mil, SCO and anything they have/own are basically chump change for a real corporation. So, if the judges (have) let this happen, then, and I hate to even think of it, we'll see this zombie keep stumbling forward...

The UNIX systems are being replaced (yes, I admit I work at one of the new stores in the US). The new system is NewPOS. It's a Windows Server 2003 environment with Windows XP embedded workstations. So I doubt they'd be interested in SCO.

Comment: Except that... (Score 0) 525

by WaxlyMolding (#24407999) Attached to: Dual Boot Not Trusted, Rejected By Vista SP1
This doesn't match my experience. I have a laptop dual booting XP and Vista Enterprise. I installed SP1 on the Vista partition with no problems. I installed it via WSUS as soon as it was downloaded to it. No, no Bitlocker, but the summary claims this problem exsists in nonBitlocker systems, too. And no TPM in the laptop.

"Being against torture ought to be sort of a bipartisan thing." -- Karl Lehenbauer