they need to do way instain comsumer> who kill thier barrys. becuse these barry cant frigth back?

it was on the charger this mroing a user in ar who had kill their three divice.
they are taking the three barry back to zero charge too lady to rest.
My parry are with the tickle chrager who lost its powre ; i am truley sorry for voltage lots.

Wait, I thought Adama's law was: The only good toaster is a dead toaster.

Apparently, you haven't been paying attention. The executive branch does just that all the time, not over measuring systems and what not, nope, just things like declaring folks enemy of the state -- like, Julian Assange, or other equally heinous acts. Protip: Only congress in supposed to be able to do that too.

You might be a redneck if, your unit conversion chart is made of empty food boxes and stolen street signs...

You took the IQ test, knowing full well it's mental masturbation. I can expect huge time wastes from you and your ilk. Gimme the idiot savant any day of the week.

Submitter has provided too vague a situation to make a determination or give advice. Please iterate ask again.

For example. All the responses to this topic are equally as valid were the question to have been: "Should I make UI good or bad?"

Yep. Space technology is a resource. In fact, space tech is the ONLY technology that's capable of preventing the extinction of the Human Race. When it comes time to get some of our eggs out of this one basket, you're going to need some space savvy to ensure a few of them are Ecuadorian.

Not only that, but the prices should never go up for the same service. It's not like the machines want better working conditions (yet). Growing revenue with a surcharge is not a valid way to grow revenue. You grow revenue by getting more customers, providing a better service, using more efficient hardware, PROGRESS. This is a pure example of profit for profit's sake. It's stealing, plain and simple. Taking from me without giving any benefit in return is stealing, even if the amount is too small for us to notice individually, in aggregate it's outright theft.

If I came home with a big pile of cash the question would be: "Wait, where did you get all this money?!" If I was AT&T my answer would be: "Uh, from customers?" "What did you do for them to get the money?!" "Nothing!" THAT'S STEALING. It would be one thing if they actually had higher costs to operate, the answer could be "I provided them with a service that cost more to provide", but that's a lie. Costs they're citing have actually GONE DOWN.

So long as it remains more profitable for companies to simply oversell and raise the prices to make profit vs using some profit to do the work to provide better services then you can expect this to happen again and again. What happens if you spend a bunch of profit to provide a better service? Your stock price goes down. Blame the fucking stock market.

I agree. I'm just they're not screwing the IETF. So long as they're our bedfellows instead, we have a fighting chance.

Just glue the pieces together. Duh. It's not like you have to take them apart, you can just buy mor-- wait, wrong story, thought this tab was the Lego Xwing story.

Based on the new YourName.com legislation, I will repeatedly file name changes and RULE the Internet as Father and Son!

Duuuuuuuuude, this is some chronically dank stank you got. I need to buy ME some bitcoins, man!

Simmons, he's the one. That's the highest bidder. Sell Now!

Does the video include footage of a female having an orgasm?

Should have shacked up with that hot little MIDI number who was left out in the cold as the poor man's network.
Then again, any pair would probably end up twisted anyway. At least they could have made beautiful music together...