From whom? I was told many years ago by a retired agent who gave a talk at my high school's career day that their unofficial policy was to not hire anyone *under* the age of 30, because they wanted you to have several years of practical experience in some related field before they would consider you for a position.
There are tons of professions where knowing how to write good code will help you achieve success over the competition. Computer programmer isn't one of them.
Ah yes, because you were a hedge fund manager as a kid, right?
Regardless of what you think you "know" about the markets, it takes lots of cold, hard cash to actually make money off of it.
This! Don't give super-mutant birds a chance to be born. Use the solar array against the NCR instead! Residents of the Mojave wasteland will thank you.
...should be the ultimate goal. Understand the design, get it under basic control and then work with a team (largest you can muster) of diligent specialists to design replacement systems that are firewalled off from the original. The reasons for this are twofold:
1) No matter how well documented, well designed, etc. the system is, your knowledge of it will never be perfectly complete and you'll never be able to turn around changes with the same degree of confidence and alacrity as the original admin.
2) Your Career -- If you bend over backwards to make the system work perfectly the original designer will still get most of the credit. If you try your best but the system falls short of expectations, you will take the blame as the new "owner" of the system. It's a lose-lose proposition. Building something new, something that you can demonstrate is supported by more than just one person (unlike the original) will be a feather in your cap.
Only three years on the job? Pop a champagne bottle and rejoice...
Some 'tussin will get her ass back on the street in no time!
That is exactly it: group bonding through shared experience.
Others would call it hazing
Killing the city of Jericho, Sodom and Gomorra because they don't agree with you is a good thing, while having a wank is a mortal sin. Burning oxes before the sabbath because the odor pleases the lord is good, but putting a dick up one's bottom is a mortal sin. If two people have sex outside of a narrowly defined set of circumstances, it is OK to stone them to death in the village square, but it is a horrible sin to show someone a breast.
Not all religions agree with one another, and some (i.e. Unitarians) are actually fervent supporters of gay rights.
These examples just serve to illustrate the complete moral bankruptcy of many religious writings. These books were not exactly written during the renaissance.
I don't recall saying anything about books but, um, okay.
[...] but it has been proven that schizophrenia and epilepsia do cause religious visions, and hence religious beliefs.
No, religious beliefs are caused by someone (typically family, ministers, etc.) telling them to you, and then by you believing them. Psychotic episodes don't cause completely original viewpoints to come into ones mind.
There is a researcher called Dick Swaab in the Netherlands that has done interesting work on simulating certain attacks by use of electrodes in humans and has thus been able to conjure up end-of-life visions, out-of-body experiences and religious epiphanies with the flick of a switch.
You may be interested to know that there is a researcher in the US called Feelma Vulva who has done some even more exciting work in the study of people responding to things that weren't actually said. Check it out.
Do please enlighten me: Is stoning your brother's wife for adultery right or wrong? Is killing gay people right or wrong?
I don't need to enlighten you. All I do is toss your questions into my Relig-o-Matic 3000 system-for-telling-right-from-wrong and...*poof*...out pops the answer, thus proving my point. By the way, most religious leaders would quite obviously find those things to be wrong. How you and so many others (with similarly sized chips on your shoulders) can't see that is beyond me.
Hint: There's the religious answer, and there's the answer deemed acceptable in modern Western civilisation.
...because religion neither exists in, nor is a part of, modern Western civilization?
Face it, religious dogma and indoctrination is WRONG. I don't need a fucking religion to tell me that.
Life is not a series of black-and-white dilemmas with obvious answers. For the not-so-obvious issues, the theist turns to his faith while others may turn to the study of ethics. And then there are those like yourself who seem to deny the existence of such issues while having misplaced knee-jerk reactions to the (completely unspecified) beliefs of others.
This perpetuates a society which can't distinguish between right and wrong,
Huh? The world's religions, each and every one of them, are a system for doing just that!
real and imagined,
Religion does not cause schizophrenia. That is a scientific fact whether you choose to believe in it or not.
and fosters abuse of the minority (be it communists, pedophiles, [...]
Yeah! Especially those darn Unitarians, always abusing pedophiles and other minorities!
As a Catholic, I am obliged to completely agree with evolution, because Pope John Paul II, Pontiff of the Holy Roman Catholic and Apostolic Church decreed that it is a valid and true theory , and have no problems with it being taught [...]
Whenever I'm preparing my next spam campaign. I mean...duh! You've got to check all 500+ of them to make sure you're getting inbox delivery. *ducks*
Sorry, I meant sodium bisulfite. Apparently, sodium bisulfate is generally recognized as safe by the FDA, and therefore, generally recognized as unfit for hot sauce by yours truly.
Actually, it's the Potassium Sorbate and Sodium Bisulfate that make Sriracha (at least the Huy Fong variety) so darn tasty. How do I know? Try buying Sriracha sauce at Whole Foods. It tastes like ketchup fermented in a goat's ass because they ban those ingredients.