Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:NASA needs a PR budget cut (Score 1) 28

by Usually Unlucky (#36338842) Attached to: Students Win NASA Moon Robot Competition
NASA spent very little money on this. Most teams were funded by their university and local space grants which almost every state has. The only real expense to NASA was in setting up the final test and the judging.

I graduated from WVU (THIRD PLACE, congratulations guys!) last year so I couldn't participate in this event, but I have participated in similar ones in years past, more elaborate ones even. Trust me they are worth the cost to the tax payer.

It wasn't until praticipating in one of these competitions and saw the actual rael world applications of my school work for the first time did I really buckle down and start to take school seriously.

Comment: ISS without the Shuttle (Score 5, Insightful) 55

by Usually Unlucky (#36133016) Attached to: Endeavour Launch Now Slated For Monday
If you want to launch station segments by themselves like the Russians do the segments become more expensive, smaller, and less capable because each segment has to be its own spaceship complete with guidance, altitude and attitude control, and docking capability.

The shuttle allowed for the segments to be large, cheep, and uncomplicated. Plus the entire integrated truss system witch is quite literally the backbone of the station could not have happened without the shuttle. You would have to get your power from smaller solar arrays, which would greatly complicate the power system. Same problem with the radiators.

The shuttle did a great job with the ISS,

To bad the ISS hasn't done a great job for science or exploration. It has just been a large overpriced diplomacy tool, mostly used to keep the Russian aerospace industry alive after the collapse so they wouldn't wonder off and wind up in china or Iran.

Comment: Re:What a joke (Score 1) 532

by Usually Unlucky (#35964168) Attached to: University Proposes Tuition Based On Major
You are making several failed assumptions about the world run by me.

1) You assume that STEM majors do not appreciate arts
2) You assume STEM majors are not creative, and will make a society of uniform rows of grey buildings
3) You assume art can only be learned by univerity classes.

I myself am an engineering graduate student. And while I don't paint I appreciate good architecture (which BTW I think is considered STEM), literature, and music. I just don't see how one might need a formal university education in those areas to make an impact on society.
 

Comment: For the Average Student (Score 1) 694

by Usually Unlucky (#35931856) Attached to: Why Science Is a Lousy Career Choice
STEM is a wonderful field if you manage to end up in the top 10% of your class, get into a good graduate school, and eventually manage 10% there too.

But for folks like me, an underachiever and average student, who ended up with an undergrad GPA of 3.5 and a Grad GPA of 3.6(so far), and only cared about airplanes and rockets throughout school, STEM has been a slap in the face.

With a degree in physics I envisioned coming out of school and being bombarded with job offers. In the entire summer of 2010 I had three interviews out of nearly 100 jobs applied for, didn't get a single position. Meanwhile I worked for 30k a year as a technician for a company which makes medical equipment where my job duties regularly included changing light bulbs and sweeping.

I only came back to grad school because I want to avoid reality for a couple more years, not because I think it will land me a better job.

Last thing I need is more competition. STAY AWAY FROM MY JOBS

Stellar rays prove fibbing never pays. Embezzlement is another matter.

Working...