Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Yawn.... (Score 4, Informative) 143

by Uninvited Guest (#46047537) Attached to: US Supreme Court: Patent Holders Must Prove Infringment
Correct. The long version: The plaintiff in a patent case is usually the patent-holder, who is seeking damages for infringement. In those cases, the patent-holder-plaintiff already had the burden of proof. In this case, the (potentially infringing) plaintiff is seeking protection from patent infringement lawsuits by suing the patent holder, requiring the (patent holder) defendant to prove that the patents are valid and/or that the plaintiff infringes the patents. Normally (and the appeals court found), the plaintiff would have the burden of proof. According to the appellate ruling, the plaintiff (potential infringer, seeking protection) would have to prove that they were not infringing, or prove that the patents were invalid. The Supreme Court reaffirmed the lower court ruling: The patent holder, whether plaintiff or defendant, must prove that the other party (plaintiff or defendant) infringed the patents, and that the patents are valid.

Comment: Re:Games are not played in the living room (Score 1) 395

Indeed, the Xbox One seems to be still based on taking turns, not sharing. If it's your turn to control the Xbox One in the living room, life is good, and world is your oyster. If it's someone else's turn to control the Xbox One, life is kind of boring and crappy.

Comment: Re:a chemical explosion in a school bathroom is ok (Score 4, Informative) 1078

by Uninvited Guest (#43609193) Attached to: Florida Teen Expelled and Arrested For Science Experiment
According to the incident report, "Mr. Durham advised Kiera told him she was conducting a science fair experiment... Wilmot advised she did not know what would happen when she mixed the ingredients. Wilmot advised she thought it would just cause some smoke." There were no injuries, no damage, not even clear intent. Where is the felony crime here? It's only in the mind of Assistant State Attorney Tammy Glotfelty.

Comment: Turn a deaf ear to DRM demands (Score 3, Insightful) 394

by Uninvited Guest (#43460885) Attached to: Netflix Wants To Go HTML5, But Not Without DRM
Netflix is facing some hard choices. With Microsoft abandoning Silverlight on its own sites, the writing is on the wall. I say, let Netflix demand anything it pleases, and ignore all such demands. Eventually, Netflix will have to switch from Silverlight to something, and HTML5 is the obvious choice. If Netflix can't get DRM in the standard, they'll still have to find a way to keep streaming using existing standards.

Comment: Google Glass records, too (Score 3, Interesting) 496

by Uninvited Guest (#43426367) Attached to: Not Even Investors Know What Google Glass Is For
Google Glass doesn't just present information; it can record, too. And if you record every little thing you see, it's possible to review and discover small, but critically important events later. For example, one of my college instructors has a child with autism. Video from his child's second birthday party helped make the diagnosis, but more and earlier footage would have helped diagnose it sooner. If my instructor had been wearing and recording with Google Glass every time he saw or watched his child, he would have had a wealth of material for evaluation and diagnosis.

Comment: Open != Free, but that's OK (Score 1) 433

by Uninvited Guest (#37456796) Attached to: RMS: 'Is Android Really Free Software?'
Google never said Android was free software. Google does maintain that Android is open, and they'll release the source code when they think it's ready. Android does not have to meet the FSF's strict definition of free and open source software; it doesn't even use the same license. A reality check by Brian Proffitt: http://www.itworld.com/mobile-wireless/204973/more-partisanship-free-software-leadership

Comment: Second-hand markets support new product prices (Score 1) 547

by Uninvited Guest (#33664300) Attached to: Xbox Head Proclaims Blu-ray Dead

digital downloads have the secondary effect of entirely cutting out the popular market for second-hand films and games — a plus for publishers, but a big negative for the consumer

It's a negative for publishers, too. Just as with cars and many other products, a healthy used market supports high prices for new products. Buyers are more willing to pay full price for new when they know they can trade it in or resell it for a substantial portion of the purchase price. Eliminating the secondary market reduces the overall demand for new products, reducing prices, unit sales, or both.

Comment: Re:Lost sales? (Score 1) 350

by Uninvited Guest (#32181562) Attached to: BSA Says Software Theft Exceeded $51B In 2009
I wonder about this, too. My suspicion is that pirated commercial software currently impacts the spread of FOSS, too. If commercial software really were locked down, much of the current base may instead turn to other free software options, including FOSS. If that change is sufficiently widespread, we might see a rapid adoption of FOSS as standard software, and commercial software as a lesser used alternative.

Comment: X-Ray backscatter blocking clothing (Score 1) 821

by Uninvited Guest (#30994862) Attached to: "No Scan, No Fly" At Heathrow and Manchester
Back in 2002, Slashdot reported on Demron, a lightweight fabric that blocks radiation as well as lead. It's $600 for a medical apron that would effectively cover the torso, but worthwhile for some, perhaps. Such clothing might even become popular and reasonably priced if, say, it was designed to include a message or image viewable only on an X-Ray backscatter scanner.

I am not now, nor have I ever been, a member of the demigodic party. -- Dennis Ritchie

Working...