Comment: Re:a chemical explosion in a school bathroom is ok (Score 4, Informative) 1078
Comment: Turn a deaf ear to DRM demands (Score 3, Insightful) 394
Comment: Re:Silverlight greatness (Score 1) 394
FTFY
Comment: Google Glass records, too (Score 3, Interesting) 496
Comment: Open != Free, but that's OK (Score 1) 433
Comment: Second-hand markets support new product prices (Score 1) 547
digital downloads have the secondary effect of entirely cutting out the popular market for second-hand films and games — a plus for publishers, but a big negative for the consumer
It's a negative for publishers, too. Just as with cars and many other products, a healthy used market supports high prices for new products. Buyers are more willing to pay full price for new when they know they can trade it in or resell it for a substantial portion of the purchase price. Eliminating the secondary market reduces the overall demand for new products, reducing prices, unit sales, or both.
Comment: Re:Lost sales? (Score 1) 350
Convert a SIM To a MicroSIM, With a Meat Cleaver 302
from the next-week-how-to-deliver-a-baby dept.
Comment: X-Ray backscatter blocking clothing (Score 1) 821
Comment: Determinism is consistent, but not supportable (Score 1) 610
Although, as we show in [1], determinism may formally be shown to be consistent, there is no longer any evidence that supports it, in view of the fact that classical physics has been superseded by quantum mechanics, a non-deterministic theory. The import of the free will theorem is that it is not only current quantum theory, but the world itself that is non-deterministic, so that no future theory can return us to a clockwork universe.
See it? At a certain level, future events are inherently unpredictable. These small uncertainties bubble all the way up to our level. So, while we can predict with confidence that the sun will rise tomorrow, certain other smaller events are inherently unpredictable. That's a a circular way of saying that subatomic particles and big things like people have free will, because at least some of their actions cannot be determined by past events and circumstances.
They do this with a proof that first assumes such a model of events exists, and then go on to prove such a model is mathematically impossible. There are no hidden variables or forces, because quantum mechanics won't allow any. The world is non-deterministic, and it's no longer possible to prove that it is deterministic.
Comment: MS, you forgot to round to the nearest tenth (Score 1) 532
Differences of less than a tenth of a second aren't generally noticeable to users, so it makes no sense to measure down to the nearest 0.01 seconds. If all of the numbers are rounded to the nearest tenth of a second, then 4 sites are a dead heat, and Chrome is the overall winner.
Single winners (>0.1 seconds difference):
Chrome: 7
FF: 1
IE: 6
2 winners (=0.1 seconds difference):
FF, IE: 2
Chrome, IE: 2
Chrome, FF: 2
Dead heat: 4 (=0.1 seconds difference)
Comment: You may also like... (Score 1) 148
The SkyCar site's news page is still up for the moment:
Comment: Re:Like Android, don't like the G1 (Score 1) 546
The phone is tied to one, and only one, Google account. That account is the only one the phone can use for GMail, GCal, Google Docs, personalized Google Maps, Picasa, etc. The only way to switch to another Google account is to reset the device to factory defaults. Even if you do get the account without providing any information, if you actually use your Google account, eventually it will have far more important personal information fed into through the phone. You'll be de facto tied to that anonymous GMail account.
+ - DVD size limiting Unreal Tournament 3 on Xbox 360->
Link to Original Source