Comment: Re:Nuclear tech is like communism. (Score 1) 292
Comment: What is your friggin' problem?! (Score 1) 292
plutonium or something...
Oh, wait...
Comment: It's the Segway fanboys who are irrational (Score 2) 533
'If we were all riding around on Segways now, cities would probably be better places to live compared to the car-infested streets we still endure. But that transformation hasn't happened. And it won’t. Why? Because Segways are lame. They’re too rational. They fail to acknowledge all the irrational reasons people love their cars.'"
Only a complete dork could make such a moronic comment. Everyone riding around in Segways would:
- Abolish what little physical exercise many people get. This would significantly exacerbate an already monstrous health crisis in the U.S.
- Require vast and expensive changes to the public thoroughfare to accommodate such a huge shift in traffic patterns.
- Demonstrate just how irrational and gullible people can be. It is little more than idiotic fashionista fanboyism. There is nothing rational about moving from cars to Segways.
- Overload the electrical grid and require enormous investments there as well. Who will pay for all of this?
- Require the fools who buy them to move back to their cars after they realize the utter impracticality of commuting via Segway.
Comment: Good God, man! GOOD GOD! (Score 1) 76
Some talk has been made of selling what are uncommon terrestrial minerals like gold and platinum, refined on orbit and deorbited at great expense as a business plan, but frankly that's absurd.
Are you crazy? Are you aware that this isSlashdot? That is pure unmitigated heresy around here! We don't want facts or lucid, rational arguments! We wan t space opera full of hot female astronauts!
Comment: Lies! Lies! ALL LIES! (Score 0, Flamebait) 218
Lies! It's clean, I tell you, it's clean! Get it through your thick stone cranium: Nuclear power is the cleanest of them all!
Sheesh...
Comment: Re:Most likely this will be Far right wingers. (Score 1) 1105
Comment: No! No! It can't be! (Score 1) 366
Comment: Re:Let Me Get This Straight Dept. (Score 1) 106
Comment: Let Me Get This Straight Dept. (Score 0) 106
So we will spend a reasonable amount of money to send a robot out someplace to fetch an asteroid and put it into lunar orbit so that some bozos can go check it out in person at much greater expense? Why not have the robot do everything for a lot less money? Could it be (just speculating here) that the $100M project is a distraction from the manned project that will, as usual, channel huge amounts of money for yet another pointless human presence?
Aerospace pork will never end. Their lobbying is just too strong, and hordes of fanboys still believe a human has to be out there or it isn't exciting enough.
Comment: Brilliant, Holmes, brilliant! (Score 3, Insightful) 142
This could lead to increased transparency for the program and stricter requirements for drone strikes.
- We're supposed to believe that the agency chartered for secret activities will give up its secret drone program and not continue subsequent drone attacks in secret.
- DoD, home of DIA, will for some reason not keep the formerly secret CIA drone program secret within the DIA. They will be transparent about it.
- It came out in The Daily Beast, so it must be true. These highly secretive organizations are now being open, honest, and accoutable to the general public.
Comment: Do at least a little (Score 1) 635
Comment: Re:Is it sentient? (Score 4, Informative) 104
we've found silicon based flora in our own deep oceans
Citation needed. There are no silicon-based life forms known to man.