Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:I fail to see the black market part (Score 2, Insightful) 282

by Tuzanor (#32081382) Attached to: Black Market May Develop For IPv4 Addresses
Any market that forms that people don't want to form is a black market. They'd prefer some "benevolent" agency to dole out the limited amount, nevermind that a few organizations are holding massive amounts of unused IP ranges. Making them worth money will encourage them to release them, but these people are afraid of markets.

Comment: Re:Close the loop holes (Score 1) 658

by Tuzanor (#31729528) Attached to: What the Top US Companies Pay In Taxes
Right, and my point is that they're doing the exact same thing you or I would do, like it or not. If you live in a city that spanned state lines (there are examples of this) and on one side the tax rate was much higher than the other, which side would you live on? The problem is high taxes in the united states - not loopholes.

Comment: Re:Close the loop holes (Score 1) 658

by Tuzanor (#31719906) Attached to: What the Top US Companies Pay In Taxes
The vast majority of the "dodged" income is foreign earned and merely just doesn't enter the US, otherwise it would be taxed. It's merely a response to incentives. Honestly, do you expect these companies to just go "oh, lets move the money into the united states where a lot more of it will be taken away than if we move it to Bermuda; especially since we already often paid taxes where it was originally earned"? Do you take advantage of mortgage interest deductibility? Retirement tax shelters? It's the same thing. The problem is that taxes in the United States are higher than elsewhere so the money doesn't come here. Pity, as America could really use the investment right now.

Comment: Don't Worry too much about it (Score 4, Informative) 467

by Tuzanor (#29725837) Attached to: Is Working For the Gambling Industry a Black Mark?
As somebody who DID work as a systems administrator for a publicly traded, Canadian based company that supplies software to the online gambling industry I can say that unless you're an executive it will have no bearing on your future employment any more than working for an 'evil' defence contractor or such will. Sure, you'd have a hard time getting a job at amnesty international after working for BEA, but the experience you'll get will open more doors elsewhere. The company had far more trouble hiring people who were willing to work for the company, in fact. Though in Canada 'online gambling' had a much more negative connotation than it does in England, where betting shops are everywhere.

The experience I got was very worthwhile. I got to travel to interesting locations to setup the servers. Places like Curacao in the Caribbean, Malta, Ireland, the netherlands (we did work for the government casinos there, in fact), etc. I started out in a very jr position, but moved up extremely quickly because I was capable and they had a hard time finding good people who were willing to work for them. This gave me Sr-level quality within 2 years. I've since moved on, but I would do it again in a second. It's not been a black mark on me at all and people are usually curious about it. Because of complex legal and national regulations, the accountants also were in a similar position. They had a lot of trouble getting quality accountants, so they had to get more Jr. ones who moved up fast.

The executives had far more trouble after leaving, though they also ran the company rather poorly. In fact I'd say that the worst part was having to work with/for some people that I would consider less than high caliber. Because of this, I became the go-to guy to fix poor decisions made from incompetence at the CTO and director level.

Comment: Re:Is it 1988 again? (Score 1) 715

by Tuzanor (#26144941) Attached to: Tech Firms Oppose Union Organizing
And most of them got new jobs. I'd rather have labour mobility than have a union take 2% of my salary and have other companies not willing to hire because it's so difficult to fire bad employees; I know this is a generalization, but overall it's true. I've done very well without union help and where I live (Ontario) there are strong enough labour laws that if a company fires me without cause, they'd better be offering me a nice package if they don't want to hear from my lawyer.
Technology (Apple)

+ - iPhone users fight AT&T in Vermont, Alaska->

Submitted by
destinyland writes "AT&T forbids iPhone contracts in Alaska, Vermont, and parts of 15 other states. But in these states "iPhone rebels" simply violate AT&T's contract and surf the networks of AT&T's wireless partners. "We will spot that very quickly," an AT&T spokesman insists, adding they would then "most likely" terminate that person's service. But other users simply open a P.O. Box in a different state — and hope AT&T thinks they're just roaming a lot. It's yet-another grass roots challenge to AT&T's exclusive carrier status. As one user complained, "I do not need Steve Jobs or the others in Cupertino, California deciding who my cellphone carrier should be.""
Link to Original Source

You are lost in the Swamps of Despair.