Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
Slashdot Deals: Cyber Monday Sale Extended! Courses ranging from coding to project management - all eLearning deals 20% off with coupon code "CYBERMONDAY20". ×

Comment Re:Maybe (Score 1) 30

"The phenomenon is real". OK. "Climate is constant," said No One. Ever.

The argument (and your attempt to milk it) is the distraction.

Well, if you're going to stand here and get milked like damn_registrars by these Progressive idiots, I really don't see the difference between you.

Comment Re:Why do you insist on misquoting me? (Score 1) 126

The fact that I voted for him and despise his decisions further supports the notion that you should be championing him as demonstration of the benefits of conservatism.

I guess it's in character. You were sufficiently stuck in foopid to waste your vote on the lying no-talent rodeo clown; now you expect me to co-op his idiotic Commie results as a demonstration of your strawmanning prowess? I say it's in character because you're so partisan that you will genuflect and vote for that Jezebel, Her Majesty, so that she can take us further down El Camino Cloward-Piven Real.

Comment Re: At what point do we reevaluate the position (Score 1, Insightful) 217

Why could that be? What has socialism done to give it such a horrible name? Go ahead and list a few items. You realize that the major victims of socialism were leftists just like yourself? You ended up in the gulag right along with the rightists you helped to put there.

Comment Re:Maybe (Score 1) 30

So who is the bigger fool, then: (a) the one who worships power as a ruling class twit while here under the sun, jetting off to Paris to whinge on about global anthropogenic non-constant climate warming change, or (b) the one who focuses on finding some joy in life, while keeping the soul minimally tainted, in view of the hereafter?

Comment Re:Why do you insist on misquoting me? (Score 1) 126

In other words, you are insisting that your labels are correct, only because you say they are. Whenever anyone else suggests a label that you disagree with - regardless of factual support for it - you tell them that they are not "in good faith" or other such silliness, even though they supported the label vastly more so than you. In other words, your argument is hypocritical.

Now you're entering into fustakrakich realms of blindness to the degree to which your arguments apply to yourself, which is 100%.
And you're still incorrect about #OccupyResoluteDesk. Were he conservative, for example, his college transcripts and writings would be known and discussed. Instead, as for all of the godless Commie sodomites of the Left (if you'll forgive the pleonasm), the Codpiece Media runs interference.
The degree to which the country was duped by this no-talent rodeo clown is only going to be fully apparent many years hence.
And all of the Tea Party criticisms will stand vindicated.

Comment Re:Why do you insist on misquoting me? (Score 1) 126

To be even more blunt, you just tried to claim that the Chinese are somehow "socialists" (based on no facts whatsoever) yet you get your undies up in a bunch when anyone calls any president in history "conservative" as a result of actually evaluating the facts of their administrative actions.

Is there a distinction to be made that the Chinese call themselves "socialist", whereas #OccupyResoluteDesk has (to my knowledge) never confused himself with a "conservative" in any way, shape, form, or context?
None of which precludes your capacity to make stuff up, of course.

Those who claim the dead never return to life haven't ever been around here at quitting time.