Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Commerce Department Pushing For New "Copyright Czar" 294

Posted by ScuttleMonkey
from the bogus-stats dept.
TechDirt is reporting that those all-too-familiar "stats" surrounding the cost of piracy are being trotted out in an attempt to push through a new "Copyright Czar" position. "In urging President Bush to sign into law the ProIP bill, which would give him a copyright czar (something the Justice Department had said it doesn't want), the US Chamber of Commerce is claiming that 750,000 American jobs have been lost to piracy. Yet, it doesn't cite where that number comes from."

Comment: Re:You'd be Wrong (Score 1) 288

by Trekie8472 (#25045943) Attached to: New York Issues RFID-Encoded Drivers Licenses
Though the possible implications of IDs with RFID are scary, there are some worthy applications of the technology. Twin Cities Metro Transit has a very handy RFID card that allows riders to pass by a sensor when getting on a bus. This saves quite a bit of time compared to the mechanical card readers when there is a long queue of people waiting to board. Instead of dropping in a card and waiting for it to pop back up, you simply wave your wallet past the sensor as you walk by.

FCC Levies Record Indecency Fine 577

Posted by CowboyNeal
from the pay-to-play dept.
Carl Bialik from WSJ writes "The FCC proposed a record $3.6 million fine against a single TV show, penalizing CBS and its affiliates for an episode of 'Without a Trace' that suggested a teenage sexual orgy, in the first batch of indecency fines proposed in more than a year, the Wall Street Journal reports. 'Overall, the FCC's action didn't provide a broad sweeping vision for broadcasters about what is appropriate for television,' the WSJ says. 'Notably, the FCC backed away from an effort to impose higher fines by holding all network affiliates responsible for a broadcast, instead of just the stations that had been flagged by a viewer in a complaint.'"

"Life sucks, but it's better than the alternative." -- Peter da Silva