Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?
Last Chance - Get 15% off sitewide on Slashdot Deals with coupon code "BLACKFRIDAY" (some exclusions apply)". ×
User Journal

Journal Journal: mostly hasta la pasta

Unfortunately the mix in the journal community long ago ceased being what it had been, so I've done the long-overdue thing and switched my new JE notification from web to email.

User Journal

Journal Journal: A nation of laws 18

Well, not exactly:

âoeIn essence, if we are ever ordered by a government authority to personally violate and sin â" violate Godâ(TM)s law and sin â" if weâ(TM)re ordered to stop preaching the Gospel, if weâ(TM)re ordered to perform a same-sex marriage as someone presiding over it, we are called to ignore that,â Rubio said in an interview with CBN on Tuesday.

âoeSo when those two come into conflict, Godâ(TM)s rules always win,â he added.

And this is the 'moderate, establishment' candidate no less. Ah well, doesn't matter. Either Cruz or Trump are going to spank him into the arms of the private sector anyway.

User Journal

Journal Journal: circular economics, or sound 23

I haven't been regularly visiting /. these last several months. I got a dog, a 2 year old Golden Retriever, and have been breaking him in to life with me. That and I have to get up at a time in the morning that begins with a "4" lately, AKA "oh-dark-thirty", so I hardly ever even turn my computer on during the week. Pre-pooch, I must've just been doing it cuz I was bored. Okay, that didn't sound right. But then again, Slashdot really is mostly just people making faux-intellectual love to themselves.

Anyways, for some real intellectual stimulation, ponder the interesting notion ole Bernie (half-heartedly) offered in the last Dem debate: He was asked that wouldn't raising the minimum wage put some workers out of work. The interesting idea was, that the workers who got to keep their jobs would now have more disposable income, and buy goods and services that they are not now, that would then mean new jobs for those who lost them in the minimum wage hike.

I have absolutely no head/intuition for economics, and as such can't figure out for myself if there could be anything to that or if it's obvious (except to me) utter poop.

User Journal

Journal Journal: Operation Wetback II 7

At lunch time MSNBC was questioning Trump's idea to deport illegal immigrants. The questions raised that I'm able to recall are:
1) How can it be done humanely?
2) How can they all be found?
3) What about the separation of families?

What popped into my head was: Q: How is it done for any other lawbreakers?

A: We apprehend them, and then we transport them.

You put them in handcuffs, to keep them from trying to elude authorities once captured. If they spit or bite, you put a mask on them. If they kick, you hogtie them. Going back for a sec, if they resist cuffing, you taze or pepperspray them. We already know how to do this humanely.

Put them in a vehicle, tell them to watch their heads as they get in, make sure their feet are in before closing the door (i.e. what seems to be perfectly routine policy, for law enforcement agencies from all over the country, from watching the show "Cops"), and then drive them to where they're told to take them.

Imagine a crew of people who'd pulled off some bank robberies. We'd do the obvious; pick them up at home, at work, at the grocery store, or whereever we had the element of surprise/had more likelihood of successfully taking them into custody without them being more prepared to escalate it into more violence.

On rounding every last one up, for lawbreakers in general, we can't find them all now. It doesn't mean we shouldn't try. Or that we should legalize bank robbery.

And we already separate lawbreakers from their families. If we avoided doing anything at all that had any side effects or downsides whatsoever, we wouldn't do anything.

It seems like on a practical level we'd probably want to try to get a couple of things done first:

I) Settle the "anchor baby" thing, Constitutionally. The kids should be considered just as illegal as their parents, and better to deport the family as an intact unit, than the kids going to wherever the government puts them when there's no parent left in the home.

II) Build the wall. Whether that be a physical wall, or a virtual wall implemented via technology, or sections of both. But it makes less sense to begin seriously bailing water out of the boat before you've plugged its holes.

As to where to transport them to, what are we doing with Syrian refugees? Apparently we've picked out 190 cities in this country where they'll be dropped off at. So pick 190 cities in Latin America.

And give the deportees their choice, as presumably many would want to be placed at or near where they came from or where extended family is located. We don't owe them that, but we're a generous people, we just don't want to be taken advantage of anymore. Give them a few bottles of water, some military rations, and some pesos in their pockets.

And possibly, for some, literature on how to apply for legal citizenship (and some idea of how long the wait might take). But legal immigration is a topic unto itself. Such as the purpose(s) of it. And how much truth there is behind "jobs Americans won't do".

User Journal

Journal Journal: tomaaato/tomotto; either way, it's red 7

From, on one reason why no one mentioned that one little factoid:

Part of this is the legacy of the Leftâ(TM)s single-largest victory in the culture war: decades of attacks on âoeMcCarthyismâ have smothered criticism of communism.

By portraying the critics of communism as conspiracy theorists and fringe kooks, the Left has created a chill effect on an entire generation.

We see the impact todayâ"nobody wants to call out actual, avowed, self-admitted, proud communists, lest they be accused of being a right-wing nut job using McCarthyite tactics.

It's an excellent point. Smitty's in denial. Bill O'Reilly outright lies about it (he's smart enough, and connnected enough, to know). The Left has made it impolite to call a communist a communist. It's been made to be like saying someone is like Hitler.

We've been suckered into obeying an imposed cultural norm of not speaking truthfully about certain truths. The GOP tells us that Islamic terrorism is our greatest threat. Fox News happily reports things and blissfully leaves out what it all means or the why, as if no one knows/it's some big mystery of the universe.

The Right wing goes along with perpetuating the Left's equivalent of the Devil's greatest con. Even the emperor's rivals are afraid to admit the obvious. We are truly the Left's bitches. It's amazing what asses Americans have let them make of us.

And what are we really talking about here. Are we calling those who want to demolish the American system abruptly "communists", and those who are doing it slowly "socialists"? As if only the former are who we should be worried about?

Even wimpily avoids the real issue. Communist orgs are relatively small and a dime a dozen. I remember seeing, quite some time ago now, on C-SPAN ole Democrat Sen. Tom "we passed this right [to health insurance] for the American people" Harkin speak at a Communist Party of America rally. So Tarantino spoke at a Revolutionary Communist Party event. Whatever.

The vast majority of the Left know America won't be brought down via revolutionary uprising by the proletariat, or blacks, or any other. What's been eating away at America the last several decades is the work of Leftists *within* the system. But there's too much social pressure to point out what's happening, and certainly too much to talk about why/what's behind it.

"Independent" Sen. Bernie Sanders is at least honest about himself, and no one bats an eye about it. He got a question in the debate something to the effect of is America ready for its first socialist president. Since we're already having ours, what they really meant is our first openly socialist president. And what would be meant by openly in this case is not just openly acting and sounding like a socialist but calling themself that.

Obama won't call Islamic terrorists Islamic terrorists, and the Right wing won't call communists(/Leftists/liberals/Marxists/Progressives/whatever) communists. Both are full of shit.

User Journal

Journal Journal: 8 months... 6

Lost my job, found a new one. Grew a goatee and shaved my head bald. (What?)
Also moved over 1000 miles away from DFW.

Just finally getting settled, waiting to get my CHL from my new home state.

... but where is here?
User Journal

Journal Journal: this terrible, terrible condition of buyable influence 17

Lefties love to thump on teh evil corps buying influence with Congress to, seen today in particular, not have to act responsible financially. Gotta love the gall:

1) First of all, Congresscritters are still subject to periodic elections, AFAIK, so citizens, not corporations, still have the ultimate say in how our reps behave. I've never understood the frequent human deficiency of ignoring the disease and getting fixated on one of the symptoms. It's just being really, really dumb. If one's kid was habitually misbehaving in twenty different circumstances, only an absolute moron would think to approach the problem by trying to change the circumstances. Individually.

Now look, of course I know that Lefties attack just certain symptoms typically not because they're actually delusional that it's the most effective way to go about solving the overall problem, but that eradicating certain things in particular is part of their religious views and therefore ranks higher than solving the overall problem. But human beings in general -- those without ulterior motives -- frequently lose track of the root problem and wander around believing the effects are it.

2) But even more to the point, what do Democrats do to be given and granted more power? They a) purchase favor with the public, b) by offering levels of goodies only financially feasible in magic fairy land.

So lemme get this straight: The very people who are complaining that those guys over there are a) purchasing favor so that they can b) act fiscally irresponsible, are they themselves in favor of other people doing both a) and b). So it's not a) nor b) that Lefties are actually against. It's just those guys over there (capitalists).

Lefties play into the human tendency to forget the forest for the trees, and act like it's these particular actions they're up in arms about. When really if they were ever honest, they'd say look, it doesn't matter that corporations buy influence, because we'd still be against them. What we're really against is private enterprise, because we think it's immoral because it leads to inequities.

p.s. BTW, I wish America would just make a decision on this stuff. I wish our next president, upon their January inauguration, would as their first task address the nation and declare 2017 a year of national discussion and debate on which direction we're going to go as a nation. Compare and contrast the moralities of capitalism vs. socialism, and then have some kind of national referendum. Send the Census Bureau around or something. But just fucking pick something; I'm tired of the trickle down, into national bankruptcy (although Obama has at least accelerated it, but surreptitiously). It's like Chinese water torture. Either open the faucet all the way (and empty the tank and let it be over and just kill us all), or turn the damn thing completely off. Drip, drip, drip... Another trillion in debt, another trillion, another trillion...

User Journal

Journal Journal: Pet Peeves of the Job Search

- Pushy recruiters with foreign accents so thick you can't understand what they are saying
- Who clearly have not read your resume and only found you on a keyword search
- Who cannot read a map and do not understand "I cannot relocate 500 miles for a temporary job, and in software, all jobs are temporary"

User Journal

Journal Journal: Well, looks like Rubio's done for 20

Bill "Always fucking Wrong" Kristol just predicted a Rubio/Fiorina ticket, which of course means he is doomed to fail. Thanks Bill! What did Marco ever do to you, huh?

I can see now why everybody's resigning themselves to Trump at this point.

Some programming languages manage to absorb change, but withstand progress. -- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982