Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:doesn't help people take games seriously either (Score 1) 737

by Toonol (#44019677) Attached to: Sexism Still a Problem At E3
I actually doubt this. Not only have I never seen a reputable source reporting this, from personal experience videogamers and other techies are about the least likely segment of the population to ever do this. Lawyers, salesmen, politicians... those are the groups that might act like this.

Comment: Re:FIrst Post Maybe? (Score 1) 549

by Toonol (#44003079) Attached to: Woz Compares the Cloud and PRISM To Communist Russia
It's an invalid point. The 'shittiest jobs' are low-paid because they're menial, require no skill, and anybody can do them. The shitty jobs that require intelligence and skill are... highly paid. And there are many shitty jobs that are highly paid.

It isn't decided by race, gender, or economic status. It's decided by the market, and the demand for the work an individual is able to do.

Comment: not sure... (Score 1) 248

by Toonol (#43730927) Attached to: Major Advance Towards a Proof of the Twin Prime Conjecture
Ok, this isn't rigorous at all (obviously), but it seems to me that if the size of the gap continuously grew, but fluctuated randomly, you would still have an infinite number of primes close together even though the average distance between them never stopped increasing. They would become fewer and fewer, but never stop, and hence would be infinite.

Not doubting the guy's work, but I'm doubting the summary's "the gaps between consecutive numbers don't keep growing forever."

To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so.