I only discovered it very recently; competition is good, right? Not sure why it started exactly, but it's good to know that there's somewhere similar in case this one continues to get worse.
There's always this:
Perhaps it'll free us from the laughable beta, and non-news for nerd clickbait too?
Also, make the headphone socket durable, and fixable, so I don't have to throw away an unfixable expensive device because a component costing 20p hasn't been attached to the motherboard in a way which will withstand the thousands of connections and disconnections it's going to be subjected to over the number of years I expect a device this expensive to last. (Apple failed at this).
Is this a question? Yes, but this is an answer.
Why? Because it affects 1 user who can work around it trivially; I imagine there are other priorities, given that there are limited resources and work has to be prioritized accordingly.
Say, you don't think he read that book first, and then posted?
Delay it a little bit until all the important archaeological items have been safely extracted, surely? They've been there millions of years; another few months/years won't hurt.
No idea, but that's her problem, and without proof it's just "chatting shit", and I didn't think Newsweek was in the business of doing that just because proper journalism times time, effort and integrity. If you just want to type something, get a blog.
Allowed to write books pretty much in peace for 50 years?
I'll get the blankets! Let's kill some kids!
How do you propose to detect people sending out proprietary information such as documents obtained via NDAs from other companies, personal information, credit cards etc if you can't monitor outgoing traffic? You're going to trust people, right? If someone is upset that their surfing/facebook etc usage on company time is being monitored so there's less of a chance I'm going to be the victim of fraud, identity theft etc then they need to get another job, or surf on their phone, or something.
It's like Chinese Whispers ("Telephone" in the US) where *everybody* deliberately messes up the message on purpose!
> All sort of white-label chinese makers? Who is buying these?
Millions of Chinese, Thai, Indian, African people.
> And can you say
> that these are truly Android tablets if they have some sort of modified android 2.3?
I'm running modified Android 4.2.2 - Cyanogenmod - on my phone. So, yes, I'm running and developing Android on it.
India has more than a `homeless` problem; I don't see how you can equate the two, unless you're rather willfully ignoring the massive problems India is turning its back on to fund these `we're in the space-age club too` extravagances.
Chances are that he's not from a country which sentences people to gang-rape:
Sure, it's a cultural thing; best not interfere or comment, right?