Hello. I am ThinkingInBinary.
You can visit my website [ttuttle.net] if you want.
these [ttuttle.net] links [ttuttle.net] are [ttuttle.net] for [ttuttle.net] spambots [ttuttle.net]. please [ttuttle.org] do [ttuttle.org] not [ttuttle.org] click [ttuttle.org] them [ttuttle.org].
I recently ran into a situation where several people have accused me of trying to tie the Holocaust into Global Warming by my use of the word "denier". My intention behind that word was, and has always been, to distinguish those who actively deny global warming from those who are merely skeptical (a smaller and smaller crowd all the time). However, I've recently seen more of this kind of argument. I have reason to believe that these people (or at least some of them) sincerely believe that there is an attempt to make such a bizarre connection.
So, my question is: what is a better phrase that still captures the essence that these people are not merely skeptics but head-in-the-sand individuals (at best) who are deliberately or ignorantly misrepresenting the existing science?
Terms I've considered:
Finally - for the few of you who actually are skeptical (I assume, perhaps incorrectly, that most of you understand and have few doubts about the climate science involved), I encourage you to read Scientific American's article devoted to answering real questions from real skeptics. As for the predictions of past IPCC reports (since the current (4th) IPCC has been an impetus for many of these discussions), I recommend this National Geographic article.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2008 SourceForge, Inc.