Forgot your password?

The Correct Response To Photo Hack Victim-Blamers 622

Posted by samzenpus
from the who's-to-blame dept.
Bennett Haselton writes As commenters continue to blame Jennifer Lawrence and other celebrities for allowing their nude photos to be stolen, there is only one rebuttal to the victim-blaming which actually makes sense: that for the celebrities taking their nude selfies, the probable benefits of their actions outweighed the probable negatives. Most of the other rebuttals being offered, are logically incoherent, and, as such, are not likely to change the minds of the victim-blamers. Read below to see what Bennett has to say.

Comment: Re:Weeding Out (Score 1) 270

by Thiez (#47929577) Attached to: College Students: Want To Earn More? Take a COBOL Class

Your statement is shit. "Some guy I knew a long time ago once used threads for some unspecified purpose and when he got to thousands of threads it become very slow". Well that is just great. What was he trying to do? How was he trying to do it? You act like your anecdote proves something but without this information it contributes nothing to what could have been an interesting discussion.

Since the discussion was originally about COBOL, are you suggesting that language is more suited to massive multithreading than Java? If so, why? And if you truly need thousands of threads, perhaps you need Erlang?

Comment: Re:The only good thing (Score 4, Insightful) 511

by Thiez (#47550185) Attached to: Suddenly Visible: Illicit Drugs As Part of Silicon Valley Culture

Someone who deliberately cuts off their own legs with a chainsaw don't get sympathy. So why should addicts?

I imagine someone who would do that on purpose must be suffering from some serious mental problem, or must have been blackmailed or under some kind of duress. Certainly they do deserve sympathy and help.

Comment: Re:Old news (Score 1) 199

by Thiez (#47287655) Attached to: Overeager Compilers Can Open Security Holes In Your Code

What "undefined" means here for most compilers is that it will make the best attempt it can under the C rules but the results may vary on different machines. Ie, it will use the underlying machine code for adding two registers, which may wrap around or possibly saturate instead, and the machine may not even be using tw's complement.

No, that would be implementation defined behavior.

Comment: Re:Let gay men donate (Score 1) 172

by Thiez (#47218753) Attached to: Human Blood Substitute Could Help Meet Donor Blood Shortfall
While one might argue that forbidding them from donating is unfair, or has a basis in incorrect assumptions, let us not pretend that allowing gay men to donate blood would make a significant difference if a shortage exists. What percentage of the population is a homosexual male? Perhaps 3%?

Comment: Re:Nails, wires or anything that can swat them (Score 2) 84

by Thiez (#46368577) Attached to: First Outdoor Flocks of Autonomous Flying Robots

Any flock of flying robots, autonomous or not, over my head or my property will encounter bags of nails, wires and other terrible obstacles designed to swat them.

Remember kids, what goes up must come down... in unrelated news, people who oppose drones can be recognized by the nails, wires, and other 'terrible obstacles' that embedded in their face.

+ - A Modest Proposal, re: Beta vs. Classic 19

Submitted by unitron
unitron (5733) writes "Dice wants to make money off of what they paid for--the Slashdot name--, or rather they want to make more money off of it than they are making now, and they think the best way to do that is to turn it into SlashingtonPost.

They should take this site and give it a new name. Or get Malda to let them use "Chips & Dips".

Leave everything else intact, archives, user ID database, everything except the name.

Then use the Beta code and start a new site and give it the name, and they can have what they want without the embarrassment of having the current userbase escape from the basement or the attic and offend the sensibilities of the yuppies or hipsters or metrosexuals or whoever it is that they really want for an "audience"."

Comment: Re:The only Secure OS.. (Score 1) 372

by Thiez (#45444275) Attached to: MenuetOS, an OS Written Entirely In Assembly Language, Inches Towards 1.0

Not this compiler-inserted backdoor crap again... Look, an assembler could insert a backdoor as well. And any of the developers could insert a backdoor. Did you read the entire source code? Even if you did, do you think you could find a cleverly hidden backdoor?

Besides, all you need to do to get rid of the hidden compiler backdoor (assuming there is one) is write your own compiler, use it to compile the suspected compiler, then use the generated compiler to compile itself, and presto, the backdoor is gone. Writing an interpreter instead of a compiler is also an option. Since you only need to do this whole process once, your compiler doesn't need to do any smart optimization and it's acceptable for the whole process to take some time (a week? a month? who cares).

Support bacteria -- it's the only culture some people have!