Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:Using Existing Plugins (Score 1) 44

by TheLinuxJedi (#34095048) Attached to: MySQL 5.1 Plugin Development
Not yet unfortunately, it would be quicker to edit the parts of the MySQL source than to try this via. a plugin right now. There is a book called Understanding MySQL Internals that could help with this if it something you wanted to look in to. I know that is something they want to eventually do at MySQL (and something we want to eventually do for Drizzle too), but it is much harder to implement than it sounds.

Comment: Re:Potential Security Nightmare (Score 1) 44

by TheLinuxJedi (#34094880) Attached to: MySQL 5.1 Plugin Development
Unfortunately no... Well, you have the standard private/protected/etc... for the C++ parts. But I suspect it would not be difficult to get around those. The basic API has basic pre-defined functions, but for the more complex types (such as storage engines) you need to include some aspects of the original MySQL source code when compiling. The original idea of the MySQL Plugin API was to make it easier for people who already (or intend to) hack in raw code to the MySQL source. So the plugin is dynamically linked in like any other library, and if it crashes then the MySQL daemon crashes. I suspect (without any firm evidence) that the kind of security you are talking about would have a significant performance trade-off. It should also be noted that (at the moment) the plugins need to be compiled specifically for your version of MySQL, so in most cases you will see the source first. There is the initial work for 'services' which will end the need for this in many cases in MySQL 5.5 and MariaDB and this is talked about in the Appendix. I hope that kind of answers your question there :)

Comment: Re:Table Index Plugin? (Score 2, Insightful) 44

by TheLinuxJedi (#34094508) Attached to: MySQL 5.1 Plugin Development
At the moment you have two options. The first is the Full-Text parser plugins, but this probably won't help you if you are handling INTs and may not quite be flexible enough for what you are looking for. If this is what you are interested in you may want to look at how products like Sphinx search engine does it, as that has a MySQL plugin. The second is indeed the storage engine plugin API. You could theoretically take an existing engine (such as the InnoDB plugin) and modify it in plugin form to work however you choose. Andrew Hutchings (co-author)

Comment: Re:Potential Security Nightmare (Score 1) 44

by TheLinuxJedi (#34093286) Attached to: MySQL 5.1 Plugin Development
Yes, as with many plugin APIs there is the possibility of poor or malicious code opening up an attack vector. Off the top of my head I suspect the biggest risk would be from say bad string process in the Full-Text parser plugins which crashes the server. I would expect most plugins to come from in-house development where there is a special need for a unique setup and this type of user would be hacking code on the server anyway with the same (or worse) security implications. Andrew Hutchings (co-author)
Book Reviews

MySQL 5.1 Plugin Development 44

Posted by samzenpus
from the read-all-about-it dept.
Michael J. Ross writes "If you were to ask some database developers to cite their favorite strategies for expanding the functionality of the relational database management systems with which they work, you would probably hear a variety of answers. One individual might recommend the use of an alternate database engine optimized for the given application. Another might explain the many advantages of using stored procedures to replace SQL queries embedded in the source code of any programs that connect to databases. But one answer you likely would not receive involves changing the internals of the database engine itself. With the latest major release of MySQL, developers using that particular RDBMS are now able to extend the capabilities of the built-in database engines, by creating plug-ins. This is the topic of a book by Sergei Golubchik and Andrew Hutchings: MySQL 5.1 Plugin Development." Read on for the rest of Michael's review.

+ - Oracle backs out of the MySQL Conference-> 1

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "Along side its move to to scuttle OpenSolaris, remove itself from the Open Office foundation, sue Google over its use of Java, Oracle has now removed itself from the MySQL Conference and is now pushing MySQL users to attend its own user group conference that it funds that has been placed on the same week as the O'Reilly conference. Is there any evidence left that Oracle has nothing but hostile intentions toward open source at this point?"
Link to Original Source

UNIX was half a billion (500000000) seconds old on Tue Nov 5 00:53:20 1985 GMT (measuring since the time(2) epoch). -- Andy Tannenbaum

Working...