Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re:no love for mutt? (Score 1, Interesting) 464

by TheGreek (#42229329) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Current State of Linux Email Clients?

They are not monkeys and not mentally handicapped, so they have no excuse regarding understanding that. And if they are, then they need some kind of legal guardian, because they clearly can't deal with the real world.

Yes...they're the ones who can't deal with the real world.

Comment: Re:Duh (Score 1) 189

by TheGreek (#37706168) Attached to: No PDFs, No Co-editing On Underwhelming Apple iCloud

Yeah, cause its never happened to anyone else before...

Last fall, Apple released their App Store Approval Guidelines. The relevant guideline—the only place where the word "duplicate" appears in the guidelines—is quoted on Stackoverflow:

Apps that duplicate apps already in the App Store may be rejected, particularly if there are many of them, such as fart, burp, flashlight, and Kama Sutra apps.

If you were to write and submit your own app that connected to Dropbox, it might get rejected. Given the number of third-party Facebook apps and Twitter clients still available on the App Store, however, I think that unlikely.

Plus there's no no shortage of web browsers on the App Store.

I feel pretty good about Dropbox never being pulled for "duplicating functionality."

Comment: Re:Amazon did it (Score 5, Insightful) 338

by TheGreek (#37656390) Attached to: Tablet Makers Try To Beat iPad's $500 Pricetag

Whereas Apple is relying on their lock-in to the "we get a cut of the action, see" iTunes store. It is a tried and true method.

Except iOS devices aren't loss leaders for Apple. Apple makes a negligible amount of profit off of its App Store. The bulk of Apple's profit comes from every device that goes out the door—whether it's paid for by you or by a combination of you and your mobile carrier.

Comment: Re:GPL is the problem (Score 1) 1075

by TheGreek (#35601268) Attached to: Apple Remove Samba From OS X 10.7 Because of GPLv3

If you believe that liberty has no conditions, such as equality, then you might be thinking of the word license.

I actually think you have that backwards--if you think that liberty has conditions, then you might be thinking of the word license.

The GPL grants many things. Perpetual access to the source code of derived works is one of those things. Liberty is not.

Comment: Re:GPL is the problem (Score 1) 1075

by TheGreek (#35600746) Attached to: Apple Remove Samba From OS X 10.7 Because of GPLv3

That's because it's not liberty for YOU (that's already been granted) but for whomever gets it from you.

If you're restricting how I can use something, you may have granted me a license, but you haven't granted me liberty.

Stop being so greedy and self-centered with your thought process.

Stop redefining words.

Comment: Re:GPL is the problem (Score 1) 1075

by TheGreek (#35600664) Attached to: Apple Remove Samba From OS X 10.7 Because of GPLv3

Not liberty for you, jackass, liberty for the people you distribute too. The original author is preventing YOU from exploiting downstream users. Your "freedom" to screw people over is not "freedom". You are being saved from yourself, and your shortsightedness.

So it's "free" as in "don't do that," then. Gotcha. That's fine. Just call it what it is instead of calling it freedom.

Let me guess, you're a libertarian? Yeah? That would explain your moral autism on the issue.

Moderate Democrat who wants more regulation in the financial industry, but thanks for trying.

Comment: Re:GPL is the problem (Score 1) 1075

by TheGreek (#35600586) Attached to: Apple Remove Samba From OS X 10.7 Because of GPLv3

Where all of you GPL-haters keep failing in this argument is that you want to deny rights to software makers

I have no desire whatsoever to infringe on a copyright holder's right to distribute his or her code as he or she sees fit.

My problem stems from the use of the word "liberty" to describe a license as restrictive as the GPL.

Comment: Re:GPL is the problem (Score 2) 1075

by TheGreek (#35600430) Attached to: Apple Remove Samba From OS X 10.7 Because of GPLv3

Apparently you don't.

I do. Create whatever restrictions you like. I don't have to use your code.

So it's "orwellian" to insist that the people who receive my software, via you, have the same rights as you did, and can use altered versions of it freely in place of the versions you gave them?

Not at all; that's not even what I said.

What I said is that it's "Orwellian doublespeak" to use the word "liberty" to describe a scheme where you've set restrictions on how I can use and distribute something.

Comment: Re:GPL is the problem (Score 1, Insightful) 1075

by TheGreek (#35600108) Attached to: Apple Remove Samba From OS X 10.7 Because of GPLv3

The GPL license is free as in liberty. Developers who wish to base products on existing GPL software must agree to maintain the liberty of the derived software's users to use the software with the same liberties that the developer did.

If you associate the words "must agree" with the word "liberty," I think you have pretty jacked up definition of liberty.

Practical people would be more practical if they would take a little more time for dreaming. -- J. P. McEvoy

Working...