Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Microsoft

+ - Expensify CEO: Why we won't hire .NET developers->

Submitted by TheGrapeApe
TheGrapeApe (833505) writes "The CEO of San Fransisco-based VC-backed startup Expensify wrote a post on the company's blog today about why he considers .NET experience on a resume a general liability and that it will "definitely raise questions" when screening for developers in his shop:

NET is a dandy language. It’s modern, it’s fancy, it’s got all the bells and whistles. And if you’re doing Windows Mobile 7 apps (which the stats suggest you aren’t), it’s your only choice. But choosing .NET is a choice, and whenever anybody does it, I can’t help but ask “why?”

Does he have a point? Or is it counterproductive to screen devs out based on what platforms or languages they have used in the past? Discuss."
Link to Original Source

Comment: Fine with me... (Score 4, Insightful) 775

by TheGrapeApe (#32818910) Attached to: Microsoft Out of Favor With Young, Hip Developers
I am a young(er? 29) developer and I do most of my development on the .NET stack. No, it's not as "cool" as being an iPhone dev, but at least Ballmer doesn't tell me I can't compile my code without forking him $100/yr...and he doesn't take 30% percent of whatever I might make selling my code.

I work in a mixed shop where most of the other devs are Ruby/Rails guys...they all see me as a "sellout" for using .NET (and maybe I am?)...but when it comes to choosing what platform to learn and code in, I'm pretty happy with Microsoft in general. It's a lot easier for me to find a job doing .NET than it is for them in Ruby/Rails...and in 5 years they'll have to throw out everything they learned about Ruby/Rails because the fanboyism that drives their community will have moved on to the next "big shiny thing" (Scala?)...I'll still be writing code in C#...Does that make me a sellout? Maybe, but I'll take more money for less work and less drama any day of the week.
Hardware

+ - Demo of Laptop/Tabletop Hybrid UI->

Submitted by TheGrapeApe
TheGrapeApe (833505) writes "The ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (ACMUIST) has an interesting proof-of-concept video up demonstrating the use of cameras and laser pico-projectors to "extend" a laptop's user interface to adjacent surfaces. The video demonstrates some simple gestures like tapping and dragging being captured on the "extended" surface. While the prototype appears to be somewhat cumbersome, it's easy to see how it might be more elegantly integrated into the hardware with more R&D. The system was developed by researchers at the University of Washington."
Link to Original Source
Movies

Sam Raimi To Direct World of Warcraft Movie 298

Posted by Soulskill
from the this-is-my-boomstick dept.
Decado writes "Blizzard has just announced that Sam Raimi is to direct the new World of Warcraft movie. 'Raimi, acclaimed director of the blockbuster Spider-Man series, will bring the forces of the Horde and the Alliance to life in epic live-action film. Charles Roven's Atlas Entertainment will produce alongside Raimi's Stars Road Entertaiment.' While it's still early in the process, does this offer hope that someone might finally make a good movie based on a game IP?"

Comment: We'll save so much money by hiring Russian coders (Score 1) 324

by TheGrapeApe (#28593977) Attached to: Goldman Sachs Trading Source Code In the Wild?
Flashback to a meeting with a bunch of douchebag MBAs 4 years ago at Goldman Sachs:

MBA Dbag 1: "We'll save so much money by moving these coding jobs overseas to Russia! American coders are getting too expensive!"

MBA Dbag2: "I don't see any drawbacks. Let's do it. As long as they can't outsource us playing phonetag and having meetings with each other all day, right?"

Comment: You can take this process and shove it (Score 2, Interesting) 436

by TheGrapeApe (#28520469) Attached to: Does the 'Hacker Ethic' Harm Today's Developers?

and they're less likely to conform to organizational development processes and coding standards.

A lot of times, the "Cowboy Coding" is more effective because the "development processes and coding standards" were implemented and enforced by phonetaggers who have never written a productive line of code in their entire lives. Those who are inclined to break them, naturally, are more productive and seem more effective - despite the grumblings of the phonetaggers that they are "unmanageable".

But, really - Does "management" have any right to blame them? They spent the last decade proving to every developer the idea that if you allow yourself or your work to be commoditized, we will ship you or your job overseas where it can be done cheaper. And "development processes and coding standards" are usually implemented with the intent of "commoditizing", to a certain degree, the work of coding....and you're going to blame the *developers* for rejecting that? Middle management in the US basically *created* the environment that forced developers to either become "Cowboys" or to compete with people making $4/hr overseas.

Speaking on behalf of coders everywhere - You can take your "development processes and coding standards" and shove it - I'll keep my job and let you grumble under your breath about how I am "unmanageable", thank you.

Comment: Chocolate (Score 1) 902

by TheGrapeApe (#28282283) Attached to: How Do IT Guys Get Respect and Not Become BOFHs?
Keep a small supply of chocolate (I find that the mini-Doves work best) with you at work for "desk-calls". People will be more inclined to communicate with you early and often (as opposed to after a huge disaster has started) if you bring them chocolate.

Another tip: Be specific when you are explaining you might have to deflect a call. "I have to fix something for Bob right away but I'll see you as soon as I'm done." is much better than just saying "Sorry, I'm really busy and I can't help you right now.".

Comment: Oh please (Score 1) 716

by TheGrapeApe (#28254959) Attached to: Kids Score 40 Percent Higher When They Get Paid For Grades
Again and again...why does *no one* understand the simple principle of CORRELATION DOES NOT EQUAL CAUSATION? The teachers may have inflated the kids grades...what if you were one of those teachers? And the low-income kids really needed that $500? I would do the same thing; Give everyone an A, whether they earned it or not...would not want to be responsible for them starving...

Comment: Easiest and Best Solution (Score 1) 604

by TheGrapeApe (#25899877) Attached to: Rewriting a Software Product After Quitting a Job?
I was in a similar situation, but where "conflict of interest" was the issue at hand instead of IP/Copyright issues.

Do what I did; Get someone who *didn't* work with you guys to be your "frontman", and have him do the sales...and even say he coded it. Shut up and don't tell the people you used to work with what you're doing and you can't get caught.
The Internet

Comcast Has 30 Days To 'Fess Up About P2P Throttling 262

Posted by timothy
from the must-bring-enough-throttle-for-the-whole-class dept.
negRo_slim writes with some welcome news from Ars Technica: "Comcast has 30 days to disclose the details of its 'unreasonable network management practices' to the Federal Communications Commission, the agency warned Wednesday morning as it released its full, 67-page Order. As FCC Chair Kevin Martin said it would, the Commission's Order rejects the ISP giant's insistence that its handling of peer-to-peer applications was necessary. 'We conclude that the company's discriminatory and arbitrary practice unduly squelches the dynamic benefits of an open and accessible Internet,' the agency declares." And from reader JagsLive comes news that Comcast has a different plan in place to deal with heavy bandwidth users: slow traffic for up to 20 minutes at a time to users who are grabbing the most bits.
Hardware Hacking

Amateur Scientists Seek Fusion Reaction 401

Posted by kdawson
from the things-that-hopefully-do-not-go-boom dept.
ElvaWSJ writes "A small subculture of amateur physicists and science-fiction fans — fewer than 100 worldwide — are building working nuclear-fusion reactors at home. The designs are based on the work of Philo T. Farnsworth, an inventor of television, from the 1960s. Some of these hobbyists hope similar reactors can one day power the planet, but so far they consume more energy than they create."
Technology

The First Paper-Based Transistors 177

Posted by kdawson
from the bend-me-shape-me dept.
Roland Piquepaille found news of research out of Portugal that has resulted in the first paper-based transistors (the original article is less informative than Roland's blog). More precisely, they've made the first field effect transistors (FET) with a paper interstrate layer. According to the research team, such transistors offer the same level of performance as 'state-of-the-art, oxide-based thin film transistors produced on glass or crystalline silicon substrates.' Possible applications include disposable electronics devices, such as paper displays, smart labels, bio-applications or RFID tags. The research will be published in IEEE Electron Device Letters in September.
Democrats

+ - Republican Bloggers vs. Reality?

Submitted by TheGrapeApe
TheGrapeApe (833505) writes "Apparently the article posted on Slashdot earlier today ("Nancy Pelosi vs. The Internet") positing that Pelosi wanted to clamp down on House Members using blogs caused enough of a stir to elicit an official response from Mike Capuano, the chairman of the House Franking Committee

First, the ONLY item we seek to address is LOOSENING existing rules to allow Members to post videos ... We are not currently seeking to address anything other than video — not blog postings, online chats or any other written form of communication anywhere on the internet. Any assertion to the contrary is a lie...Our approach allows the American public to have full access to information from Members while ensuring that taxpayer dollars do not support commercial or political advertising on the web. Certainly, there may be other means to achieve that goal and I am open to that discussion. What I am not open to is the intentional distortion of deliberative discussions for the sole purpose of scaring some segment of the public.

As someone who follows politics, I found it a little hard to believe that Pelosi really wanted to stifle blogs as an outlet of political communication; Especially considering that her blog and on-line presence seems to generate quite a bit more traffic than that of her Republican counterpart."

Never trust a computer you can't repair yourself.

Working...