Submission Summary: 0 pending, 3 declined, 0 accepted (3 total, 0.00% accepted)
Well, The Register is carrying a column, that claims that not all was what it seemed with the campaign against the bill. According to the article, the bill was not as nefarious as claimed, it would have only applied to those paid more than $25,000 per quarter, had a readership of 500 or more, and "if they spent all of their time encouraging the general public to contact an executive or legislative official over a matter of public policy."
The article also accuses the person who ran the campaign site of "spreading the Fear among the entire blogosphere."
The question is: has the article taken a little poetic license, or has the internet community been used as a tool in someone's political agenda?"