Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


Comment: Re:celebgate (Score 1) 93

by TRRosen (#47995713) Attached to: Apple Allegedly Knew of iCloud Brute-Force Vulnerability Since March

Your bank account info is private by nature an icloud account is not. People will know your email.
Apple must maintain a balance between security and usability. If Apple were stupid enough to use a 5, 10 or even 20 attempt then cutoff system it would simply create a huge weakness for DOS attacks. Having a cool off period after multiple fails is the best strategy it makes brute force attacks useless as I could take years to get in. Alerting people after failed attempts is useless. Any webmaster knows that every possible point of entry will but subject to constant attemps. People would get these alerts all the time making them meaningless.
In the end it is all dependent on the user. The more sensitive what your protecting the stronger your passwords need to be.

Comment: Re:It's almost sane(really) (Score 2) 502

by TRRosen (#47582371) Attached to: Judge: US Search Warrants Apply To Overseas Computers

Actually doesn't matter if your US or Foreign a subpoena is a subpoena. You must produce the evidence if it is in your control. Where the evidence is irrelevant you are within the jurisdiction you are compelled to produce it. This has been applied to physical documents. Not this is not seizing evidence it is compelling an entity to produce it.

Comment: Re:It's almost sane(really) (Score 5, Insightful) 502

by TRRosen (#47581297) Attached to: Judge: US Search Warrants Apply To Overseas Computers

That is a completely irrelevant example. Were not talking about subpoenaing a foreign company or entity. We are talking about forcing companies operating in the US to turn over information that is in their possession (under there control).

The basic concept here is that data does not exist in the physical world. Where the electrons are is irrelevant if the entity that controls it exists in the US.

Comment: Let's do the math (Score 1) 363

by TRRosen (#47178921) Attached to: Group Demonstrates 3,000 Km Electric Car Battery

That's $200 of raw aluminum. So at least $400 for the battery pack plus $100 to do the swap.

Your most likely looking at $500 for a 1000 mile battery.

So 4x more expensive then gas or standard battery pack. I don't see the oil companies quaking in fear.

Range extending technologies can not be viable if they cost more than an ICE.

Comment: No smoking gun (Score 2) 215

by TRRosen (#46984003) Attached to: Plaintiff In Tech Hiring Suit Asks Judge To Reject Settlement

There is no smoking gun because "no hire agreements are not per se illegal". You have to prove the agreement resulted in a "naked restraint of trade". The likelyhood of this case being won in court was nil. Courts have rarely if ever made such findings without evidence that employees where prevented from leaving or initiating contact with other companies. All we have here is a no poach agreement which has no chance of being viewed as restraint of trade. All in all, this is just a nuisance suit that was cheaper to settle then defend and that caused so amount poor publicity.

Comment: If only (Score 2) 287

by TRRosen (#46747241) Attached to: Bachelor's Degree: An Unnecessary Path To a Tech Job

If only HR managers understood this or knew that computer science has nothing to do with computers. The entire computer industry was built by college dropouts and is ruled by technology that changes faster then a 4 year degree. Hire people that understand technology and can learn new tech on the run. Degrees are meaningless in tech and are becoming more so in all areas.

Sigmund Freud is alleged to have said that in the last analysis the entire field of psychology may reduce to biological electrochemistry.