Electric car makers are recreating the performance of petrol-driven cars with electric drive-trains, and then selling them as "more environmentally friendly". This is completely mis-marketing. The problem is, as many people have commented, the manufacturing techniques are not environmentally friendly.
The current prime culprit is the lithium batteries. This is touted as energy efficient storage, which it is, but it ignores two problems: whilst it is not a rare-earth, mining it and manufacturing with it has been linked with large environmental problems. And the recycling industry is minuscule. By contrast, lead-acid batteries are a very well known and mature technology, and the recyclability of lead-acid batteries is better than 97%. The only problem is that they're heavier than lithium.
I think electric car makers need to figure out how to live with that problem. It would mean they can make and sell electric cars for considerably less than they are doing at the moment. And that means people would find them affordable and would buy them. It also means they could make them user-replaceable. As for lack of performance, that shouldn't be a problem. People buy and use many many small, underpowered cars that struggle to beat a bicycle down a hill.
The other problem is the infrastructure for charging. Research proceeded apace some years ago for a paddle-based system for electric cars to charge whereever they were parked. Whilst this seems to have been abandoned, it does show that the problem of infrastructure *must* be tackled by manufacturers. They need to look at the history of how the petrol delivery infrastructure developed and see what they need to leverage to make that work. And they need to look at working together, not in competition. A battery exchange system might be one answer, but you have to be able to put Ford batteries into Mitsubishi electric cars (for instance).