Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

SquierStrat (42516)

SquierStrat
  (email not shown publicly)
http://slashdot.org/
AOL IM: squierstrat16 (Add Buddy, Send Message)

20 years old. Game enthusiast, computer programmer/technician, musician, baseball enthusiast. College Student. United States Marine.
Posted by kdawson on Monday November 06 2006, @05:24PM
from the single-point-of-failure dept.
An anonymous reader writes, "Freedom of speech, the future of the Net, you name it. In October, a U.S. vigilante group asked Verizon to cut off Net access to Epifora, a Canadian ISP that hosts a number of (entirely legal) web sites offering support to minor-attracted adults. Shortly thereafter, Verizon gave 30 days notice to Epifora, ending a 5 year relationship. Telecos have traditionally refrained from censoring legal content, arguing that as 'common carriers' it is outside of their scope to make such decisions. Furthermore, they have refrained because if they did so in some cases, they might be legally liable for other cases where they did not exercise censorship. The questions are: has Verizon forfeited their claim to common-carrier status by selectively censoring legal speech that they do not like? And can the net effectively route around censorship if the trunk carriers are allowed to pick and choose whom they allow to connect?"
+ -
 [+] story, yro, censorship, nambla, nsfw, thinkofthechildren, pedophiles