Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?
Slashdot Deals: Deal of the Day - Pay What You Want for the Learn to Code Bundle, includes AngularJS, Python, HTML5, Ruby, and more. ×

Comment Re:Not meant to be a good device but to undercut C (Score 1) 172

Two of the pins (+5V and any GND) on the 40-pin connector can be used to supply power instead of going through the USB port. That's what I did with my beer-fridge controller: power for the whole system comes through the barrel connector on the 1-Wire/I2C interface board in the middle of the stack.

Guess I shoulda looked at the pinout before leaving that comment. What do you need for I2C? Is it more than some resistors? Hmm, I looked and it seems you just connect up the pins. Internal pullups? on-board? Leaves it to external? I am way too lazy to hunt through the docs to find out. Did you put in some fuses or something? My experience with I2C is so far limited to connecting Arduinos to IMUs and so on. Also did the SPI sdcard thing there with the sdfat lib. Hooray for electronic tinkertoys.

Comment Re:Duh (Score 1) 641

I cannot understand your "logic".

I'm not surprised, your reading comprehension is lousy.

The reason I don't write a replacement is because I'm lazy. I take full blame and responsibility for that.
I give full blame and responsibility to the systemd team for writing lousy code. These two things are not exclusive. Both can be true.

Does that makes sense to you now?

Comment Re:Duh (Score 1) 641

You've been around this debate to know that systemd isn't an init system.

Of course. I think I even stated something similar elsewhere. I wasn't trying to imply that it is only an init system.

My complaints are not the features provided by systemd, but rather the architecture of systemd. Being unable to separate the init from the rest of the system is merely one obvious symptom of the larger problem.

Comment Re:Wrong way around (Score 1) 641

I investigated in detail why Debian adopted systemd, and wrote about it here. It largely agrees with your post, that people mostly want to get away from sysv init, and of course sysv init has been controversial since it was created, which is why BSD never used it.

The problem with systemd isn't the features it tries to provide, the features are good. The problem is the architecture of the software is really bad. There is absolutely no reason KDE should depend on a particular init system.

Comment Re:Duh (Score 1) 641

All I can say is you've either never looked at the systemd code, or you don't know what monolithic is. The problem, of course, is that you can't have things like logind without using systemd init.

It is in several parts (so not monolithic)

OK, you don't know what monolithic means. The problem with systemd isn't that it adds features, features are cool. The problem with systemd is the architecture is bad. Unfortunately that isn't something I can discuss with you, because you lack expertise in the area, but if you are interested in learned more, I discussed it in depth here.

Comment Re:Windows 7 (Score 1) 333

I never experienced any of that. Vista was actually quite pleasant for me and moving to Windows 7 wasn't really much of an upgrade. Maybe the laptop you tried Vista on just had poor specs.

The world disagrees with you. There were actually lawsuits over computers carrying vista-ready stickers that wouldn't run vista worth a crap... the same machines would later go on to run Windows 7 without a hitch. It's not just me, it's just you. Do you work for Microsoft, or what? Even the people I know who work there won't defend Vista, so it must be something else.

Comment Re:So... (Score 1) 69

Since Linux users make up 1% of the market share (I'm not sure the % for gamers, but could be lower), I'll doubt they'll lose sleep over it.

The question is, if they get really rock-solid drivers for Linux desktops, would the effort carry over towards entering the market for graphics chips in other things that run Linux like Android tablets and phones?

There is no market for graphics chips in those things, only SoCs which converge graphics with the CPU core. nVidia has an ARM SoC product like that, but AMD doesn't. AMD is sampling ARM server chips but has not even announced a mobile part. Meanwhile, nVidia is on what, their third or fourth Tegra? ATI actually used to make graphics chips for cellphones back when they did use separate GPUs; I used to find their cute little chips inside of Motorola phones, like V-series and RAZR. But now they don't, because they have nothing to offer.

I've been a proponent of AMD for many years, but what we're seeing now is the middle of the end. (The beginning was when they revealed their new architecture and it was... meh.)

Comment Re:Well thats odd (Score 1) 87

Ever had a cab driver who had no idea of where they were going but relied on a GPS?

I've had cab drivers who claimed to know where they were doing and then did much worse than a GPS. Granted, they didn't have a fancy-pants test to make sure that they would do better. The thing is that network connected GPS gets better when more people use it, but a person is always just a person. They can get better by studying... or connecting themselves to additional tools, like GPS.

Sometimes, GPS routes are utterly ridiculous.
I don't want to pay some clown a bunch of extra money because he got stuck in traffic or took a longer route because he had no idea where he was going.

Right, but that's the merit of realtime, network-connected routing. The more people use it, the better it works. It gets more data back, so it can make more accurate estimations and send you down more efficient routes. If you know a shortcut, and you can outdo the GPS, then by all means take that route while using GPS navigation and let the network learn from you instead of complaining about how bad it is!

Comment Re:Not actually available now (Score 1) 172

it was immediately available, you just were too late (and so was this article :p)

Even assuming that was true, it wasn't immediately available for $5 anywhere in the world, unless you got it "free" with a magazine nobody should want because better information is always available online. Why not just wait to announce immediate availability until more than a handful of people can get it immediately? It wouldn't cost anything to just tell it like it is instead of inflating the story to look good.

Comment Re:Wut? (Score 1) 87

Some of you guys are very good at making it sound like you know what you are talking about. But trust me.... You don't.

We have no reason to believe that you are anything other than that which you are labeled, an anonymous coward who likes to talk shit but who won't back anything up.

I think you just want to make yourself sound smart, when in reality you don't know what you are talking about.

You mean like a cab driver who thinks they know traffic conditions better than a computer network that gets reports on it in real time? Even proponents of the black cab system have to admit that the best reason to keep it around is that it creates jobs. Meanwhile, it is one of the more expensive systems.

Comment Re:Implementation is questionable (Score 1) 87

"The machine is broken" is what you will hear most of the time if you offer a card at the end of the ride.

And if I heard that, "I don't carry cash" is what the driver would hear, whether it was true or not. They can run the card or they can have an IOU. If they don't tell you about their defective equipment up front, they don't have a leg to stand on when they complain about a lack of immediate payment. Then you can watch them pretend to "try" to get it to work, the disingenuous bastards.

Comment Re:I thought this was mostly (Score 1) 69

AMD shifted their development process for the Catalyst driver set, focusing on delivering feature updates in fewer, larger updates while interim driver releases would focus on bug fixes, performance improvements, and adding new cards.

And my first thought was, how the hell else do you develop software? You put out one or two big releases a year and then fix and patch up in between. What the hell was AMD doing before Crimson? Where they completely re-writing their driver stack 3 or 4 times a year?

Well, the way AMD has been doing it is that they make some minor changes occasionally, and once in a while they make the driver configuration GUI bigger and more bloated and increment the major version. Then you have to wait for someone (e.g. DnA) to hack the drivers up to make them not crash your system. At least, that's my experience of ATI graphics on Windows. I still have one machine with integrated Radeon, and it is by far the biggest PITA of everything I own. Making it work right on Windows is difficult and making it work properly on Linux is impossible. It was a netbook and the graphics were old so I thought "surely this will be supported by Linux so I can still use it when I'm tired of running windows on it" and then... fail. I get massive display trashing while using acceleration and it has actually gotten worse with subsequent versions since the first one I tried. Using the vga driver works but disabling renderaccel doesn't, so it must be some basic flaw in the way the hardware is initialized... Gee, I thought AMD gave away all the information needed to support this old hardware! And when it was brand new, fglrx already said that it was too old and thus unsupported. Thanks, AMD!

Comment Re:Not actually available now (Score 1) 172

are you gonna cry and throw a tantrum if you can't have it RIGHT NOW or are you going to understand the reality of the supply pipeline

Actually, I'm going to complain about how Eben, Liz, and the Pi Foundation in general set unrealistic expectations. For example, Liz demonstrating Android ICS on the Pi and then never releasing the code, nor an explanation for why not (probably Broadcom contractual bullshit) or now Eben claiming that the Pi Zero is immediately available when it is not immediately available. Why do they have to tell lies? Why can't "coming soon" be good enough?

Now, why can't you demonstrate even the minuscule amount of courage needed to log in before talking shit? Concerned you'll lose your editor job?

Let's organize this thing and take all the fun out of it.