Insightful? Really? I mean...yeah, that's always an option to the consumer but this isn't exactly an insightful tidbit of information.

And they would be called out that, just like you were.

But how does Energizer feel now, with egg on their faces?

Well, I'd say the yolk's on them for sure.

Holy hell, someone else who remembers/is a fan of TKK?

No.

If you're interested in helping, check out http://www.haystacknetwork.com/.

Yes, and I'm not ashamed to admit it. =)

Look at all those 3 and 4 digit UIDs!

Heidi Montag?

Isn't this why we have web standards? If you adhere to the damned standards, doesn't the rendering engine become all about performance instead of which one looks better, or renders "more correctlyer"?

I seriously, seriously hope my sarcasm meter's broken, because you can't possibly be serious when saying something as reprehensibly stupid as "So, yes, there is a legal obligation to check your inbox on a regular basis". That's the reason you posted as an AC, right? Because you didn't want this coming back to your actual /. account?

I mean, when a program goes so long without being updated, touched, or improved upon in any way shape or form, it's gotta be public domain, right?

Katabatic winds are caused by cooling air moving downhill, so it seems to me that they would be the greatest around the shoreline and non-existent at the center.

You mean so all the windows on my XP machine have a different look and the "minimize" buttons don't line up when I stack multiple windows on top of each other? No thanks.

At a glance, I thought that the article title meant that Firefox 4.0 was going to be based upon the Chrome browser, and therefore Webkit... no such luck, I guess. A browser which has full compatibility with the Firefox legacy of plug-ins, and runs on the Webkit rendering engine would almost certainly replace Safari as my default browser on both my Macintosh and my PC -- and I would hazard a guess that I'm not the only one who could say this. What's more, then the "browser wars" would effectively be whittled (back) down to a boxing match between Internet Explorer and Webkit, instead of this wild-and-crazy-free-for-all that's been going on ever since Netscape gave up the fight and sold out to AOL. Maybe then, the collective market share of all of these webkit-based browsers might drive web development more strongly to a "standards centered" philosophy of design and away from the "IE workaround" philosophy of design.

Ah, well. A guy can dream, can't he?